User talk:Clary Jaxon
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
What you did on 2014 University of Minnesota rape case is more than a little problematic. Drmies (talk) 15:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
@Drmies Being new to editing Wikipedia I fully understand removing the two pieces of material referencing a single twitter post and a reference to the subject matter's blog post matter, but it's a stretch to say "much" of my inserted material was sourced from twitter. The current version you reverted to is still quite sensationalist and inaccurate. At the very least the sentence about the alleged physical injuries, "He left claw marks on her body, bit chunks of her breasts, and shoved his fist so far into her mouth that he tore open part of her tongue during the attack.[2]" alluding to 1st or 2nd degree criminal sexual assault conviction is not correct and should be removed as they are just allegations. The referenced source, crimewatchdaily.com got it wrong and sensationalized the story. Drill-Mellum was only convicted of 3rd degree criminal sexual misconduct, involving lack of consent. I appreciate your consideration in this particular modification.
@Drmies Being new to editing Wikipedia I fully understand removing the two pieces of material referencing a single twitter post and a reference to the subject matter's blog post matter, but it's a stretch to say "much" of my inserted material was sourced from twitter. The current version you reverted to is still quite sensationalist and inaccurate. At the very least the sentence about the alleged physical injuries, "He left claw marks on her body, bit chunks of her breasts, and shoved his fist so far into her mouth that he tore open part of her tongue during the attack.[2]" alluding to 1st or 2nd degree criminal sexual assault conviction is not correct and should be removed as they are just allegations. The referenced source, crimewatchdaily.com got it wrong and sensationalized the story. Drill-Mellum was only convicted of 3rd degree criminal sexual misconduct, involving lack of consent. I appreciate your consideration in this particular modification. Clary Jaxon (talk) 21:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Hi Clary Jaxon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.