User talk:Caulde/Archive/20

Lantz631

I'm considering his unblock request ... the artist seems to be notable by one major-label release, and I've asked him to find and provide some reliable sources on his page. Do you have any comment? Daniel Case (talk) 14:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scottevans

Thanks; good work! —TreasuryTag talk contribs 12:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you decided to block this user (Scottevans05 (talk · contribs)) despite my concerns, the user was warned a lot previously so I accept the block. However, the edits were not persistent and obvious vandalism so I do question whether it was appropriate to report it to WP:AIV, and to be honest I am not sure that a indef block was necessary either. I will keep any eye out for any indication that the user wishes to learn lessons from the block, and take things from there. Camaron | Chris (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect Camaron it was seen to be persistent not only by TreasuryTag (TT) but also Porcupine and Jayron32. Yes, I do understand there was a large time period between the final warning issued today and the one imposed previous to that. However, the user obviously knew what he was doing, and the attitude in which he carried out the edits for which he had received notes and then progressively moving towards warnings, continued. I will however shorten the block if there is a call to do so, but I should still think that it should be for a lengthy period of time; by which I mean the block should reflect the editing manner which has been conducted. Regards, Rudget (?) 12:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to point out that I didn't actually see the report at AIV, but was infact looking at this and then decided to follow the redlinks, as I usually do. I am weird like that. Rudget (?) 12:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I was very clear, there is no doubt he was persistent, the point I am making is it was not persistent and obvious vandalism, hence why I questioned the report at WP:AIV. However, I generally agree the user was being disruptive. Thanks for explaining anyway, one issue with AIV bots is it removes requests of blocked users regardless of if the blocker has seen the report. I have found from past experience that these types of users often don't take warnings seriously for some reason, get blocked, and then after the block has expired (if it does) start making constructive contributions. That is why I am now leaving a note on this users to explain the block in more detail. Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I guess it's up to him whether he does want to constructively contribute or not. Rudget (?) 13:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, this will help us found out the users intentions. If he makes no further edits or just blanks the page etc then we will just have to move on. If he does respond postivley, which I hope occurs as this user did actually make some good faith and reasonable contributions within the disruptive ones, then we can consider accepting that the preventive nature of the block no longer applies, and a unblock can be considered. Camaron | Chris (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Rudget (?) 14:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Project Report

Hey Rudget! Nice job keeping the Project Report for the Signpost running! I've been gone for a while, and was worried it might not be continued...thanks much, and keep up the good work! Cheers, ( ar ky ) 18:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What right do you have to do that? I believe Collins is in the right and none of you mysterious senior editors are talking on the level and without contention. On what grounds would you have to block? At least unblock Collins on the talk pages so we can hear what he has to say. Mecha12 (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject report

I see that you are the writer for the WikiProject report in the Signpost. I'm wondering how you can apply your Wikiproject for the segment for a future issue. The Chronic 05:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling. So how does the process work? The Chronic 04:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, any interviewee would do good. I would recommend interviewing either Nikki311 (our first PW admin) or any person in "The Kliq" (a group of the more active PW editors). The Chronic 15:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more question: is it possible for multiple people to be interviewed? The Chronic 16:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's see: TJ Spyke, LAX, RobJ1981, Naha, and (selfishly) me. :) The Chronic 16:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am a part of The Kliq, and would definitely be interviewed if possible. iMatthew 20 08 18:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have to say, that maybe, if we could do a fifteen question interview. We could have fifteen users answer one question each. There are a lot of experienced, active editors in our project. The fifteen I would say would have to be: Nikki311, LAX, Naha, TJ Spyke, ThinkBlue, Truco-X, NiciVampireHeart, GaryColemanFan, Zenlax, The Chronic, Gavyn Sykes, D.M.N., Alex, The Hybrid, and myself (not to be selfish). iMatthew 20 08 18:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

15 is way too many. For the interview why not have 2 questions for two people, and three for another: those can be IMatthew, The Chronic and Nikki311. The report will be placed on Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-03-10/WikiProject report. Rudget . 10:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thats cool. I'd speak with Nikki and Chronic about who answers which questions. But a question for you, once we decide, can I start answering the questions? iMatthew 20 08 12:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'd like three and four, but I'd like to make sure that Nikki and Chronic are okay with that. iMatthew 20 08 12:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took me so long to respond, but I've been busy in real life. I'd love to participate in the interview, and I'm fine with iMatt taking #3 and #4. Nikki311 18:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered three of the questions. Would you mind adding that we also have a Featured Topic to the introduction? It's a pretty big accomplishment, in my opinion. Thanks. Nikki311 23:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your quitting the MEDCAB case

You have quitted, while leaving the MEDCAB page full of indirect talk about your recess and about individuals - rather than about the article, so I opened a new MEDCAB case. By the way, after I opened the new page - the old page was closed by Addhoc. Eliko (talk) 19:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ED_Railway_Sign.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ED_Railway_Sign.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mine RfB innit?

Why thank you! As you know, my RfB passed successfully with (133/4/3). And that means I pretty much own the universe now! And you're partly to blame.... But in all seriousness, thanks for your unswerving support and dodgy questions, I appreciate them both in equal measure! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal

What happened to WP:FPORT page colour? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!

For the cleaning up the vandalism on my talk page! Xdenizen (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeygopi Panisilvam

Hello, my page Jeygopi Panisilvam was deleted because it was an unsourced biography of a living person. Actually, Panisilvam died in the 40s. Could you please restore the page? Thanks, JPAnis (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, it's working now. JPAnis (talk) 12:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People keep doing bad stuff to it. Can you stop them doing it? JPAnis (talk) 12:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! JPAnis (talk) 12:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please unprod Jeygopi Panisilvam? It is notable and I do cite a source (see the references section). JPAnis (talk) 13:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rudget. The book JPAnis offered as a source doesn't seem to exist, according to Amazon and Google Books, and Calcutta Press doesn't seem to exist either, except as a simple printer. Furthermore, the article itself is very silly - apparently he was killed in 1948, but became tribal leader in 1956, after the tribe had been dissolved in 1947. Looking at the page history, I suspect that this is a class of schoolkids playing games with each other. Could you consider whether this can be speedied as a blatent hoax/vandalism, or failing that unprotect/reduce to semiprotection so I can nominate it for deletion? Cheers, Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 13:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. I've listed it at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeygopi Panisilvam, but since the article's protected I can't put the AfD template at the top of the page - would you mind adding it please? Thanks Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 14:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hello Rudget,

Just a note that I have started an editor review process for myself with purposes of getting feedback on where I can improve upon my usership. I may use it in any admin nomination way down the line. I don't expect you to participate (I understand that third parties should be involved here), but wanted to let you know I'm being pro-active about this. -- Jza84 · (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wikibreak

[1] Date changed per request. Enjoy your relaxation time! - Revolving Bugbear 14:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I remember the wikibreak enforcer... hated it, despite the fact that it carried out its intended purpose. ;) · AndonicO ^Hail! 18:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to remember the password for User:Andonic. Hehe... · AndonicO ^Hail! 23:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Report (3-17)

Is it still open? I'd like to make a request for Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones. Just reply if possible.^Mitch 32 ^contribs 11:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My pals had a question. Can you interview more than just me, we've got 4 people willing to be interviewed if that's ok with you.^Mitch 32 ^contribs 16:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Muse_Man_12321

I don't know what to do about this guy. At first glance he appeared to be a typical vandalism only account: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] but then I looked further and saw he had some positive, if minor, contribs: [8] [9] [10]. I don't get how someone's done as much vandalism as he has without a block, but on the other hand it seems odd that he does good work mixed with vandalism and ignores all the warnings. :/ Any idea what to do? -- Naerii · plz create stuff 14:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Level

Hi Rudget, you probably don't know me at all, I do a lot of vandalism patrol. Anyway, I've been looking at the vandalism level, and I would personally think that level1 would be warranted, but I think I should ask you. What do you think? Steve Crossin (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will re-elevate it for now, as it seems very obvious to me that the vandal level is very severe (I checked a few things to be sure). Just wanted to be sure you didnt object. Steve Crossin (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rancile

Delete and salt, please. This is this article's 6th reincaration. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 18:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection rationale

I saw that you protected User talk:Oh wiki your so fine your so fine you blow my mind because “user and sockpuppet are vandalising page”. Would you mind sharing some of those edits? Both the vandalism and the sockpuppet edits would be helpful. — Knowledge Seeker দ 19:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the requesting editor may have misjudged the situation. I’m going to remove the protection for now. If you have links to the vandalism or other information I should be aware of, please let me know. Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker দ 20:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was a single episode of vandalism from over two days ago. I do not think this demonstrates that "user and sockpuppet are vandalising page". Furthermore, if Adrian is vandalizing a page, then he should be blocked; protecting the page he is vandalizing doesn’t really make sense to me. Now if you’re suggesting that because his old username is under a username block, his talk page should be protected, that’s a different matter — one I didn’t see in the protection rationale nor made clear to Adrian. If you are going to protect it for that reason, I would suggest first placing a prominent notice at the top directing users to his new page. It’s quite an amusing name — blocked for length, not for inappropriateness — and other users may wish to contact him. — Knowledge Seeker দ 20:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheapshot's Sucka Breaks

I would like to request Cheapshot's Sucka Breaks be un-deleted. It's a notable release, by a notable group, and it was put up for deletion by User:Cosprings, who has been vandalising pages associated with Styles of Beyond. I've had to revert multiple things he's done, along witht he fact he's hosting illegal torrents on his page. Jay (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the page was encyclopedic, however, I am willing to restore it if by doing so you can improve the article and negotiate content on the talk page before any promotional content etcetera. is added. Rudget . 20:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't have any more info to improve it at the moment, but I've actually purchased the vinyl, and once I get it, I can supply the article with more information, such as track times/names/a scan of it for the picture, and whatever else it supplies me with. But yeah, that sounds good. Thanks a lot for your help. Jay (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm sure you'll do fine. Rudget . 20:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:76.250.184.110

76.250.184.110 is back again and adding imeem links to the article. Would you mind blocking? Thanks. -- Naerii · plz create stuff 20:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks for your support. - J Greb (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeygopi Panisilvam G3 speedy

The G3 speedy tag I placed on the article covers blatant hoaxes. This article is most definitely a blatant hoax. There is no reason why the article should survive a speedy it does not deserve to survive merely because there is an AfD in progress. DarkAudit (talk) 00:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dick's Cabaret

My other account was User:Titlebaumnow, but I lost the password. You deleted Dick's Cabaret, stating that the article did not indicate importance/significance. The article indicated that "In March 2008, the club was placed in the national spotlight when it was revealed that David Hernandez, a singer and current finalist on the seventh season of American Idol, worked at the club in 2004." That seems like importance/significance. Please restore the article. Thanks! -- Fredgremlint. —Preceding comment was added at 04:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you

Very much for the AWB thing. You may be surprised to know that it's not the first time I've been confused for a bot. Thanks again.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 10:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it's something I look back on very fondly. Especially since it's the first actual message I ever received from someone (third section down). It actually started at AN/I. I Didn't even know what AN/I was at the time. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 11:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, those were the good ole days, when fighting vandalism was more personal. Recent Changes in one tab, the list of warning templates in the another. I made my first thousand or so vandal fighting edits that way. Kids these days have it too easy. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 11:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Riana's request for bureaucratship

Dear Rudget, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DeadEyeArrow

I did it now. So in effect, my company just paid me to do this :o) Your co-nom is awaited. Will you tell DEA when you've finished so DEA can transclude it and restart the clock etc? ➨ REDVEЯS is a satellite and will be set alight 12:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doing... - thanks for informing me. Rudget . 12:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Rudget . 12:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jimfbleak (talk) 13:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Thanks for the reply, I'll look into it. Solestin (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

It's gonna help me how exactly? TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 16:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sure. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article

Your comment in the deletion log seems to suggest that you deleted it because an author requested its deletion. I (and others) also had contributed to the article and I want it restored. Its surprising that you didnt think it fit to ask the editor to take it to AfD if he wanted it deleted. The article which User:Knowledge Hegemony had authored had problems of {{tone}}, undue and {{POV}} and I'd painstakingly worked on fixing it. I was working my way through the article and was more or less done with the lead. Please restore the article and ask the editor to take it to AfD instead. Thanks. Sarvagnya 18:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had read the article (though not contributed to it) and thought it to be quite well developed and cited; although as Sarvagnya points out it (like almost any wikipedia article) could be improved. I too would request you to restore the article. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that User:Knowledge Hegemony has possibly retired. Unfortunately, his email is disabled so we cannot ask him the reasons for his deletion request and retirement.

Anyway, since

AFAIK there are no privacy concerns,
the content is GFDL (and it would be a licensing violation to recreate the article based on a cached copy),
User:Sarvagnya and others (?) contributed to the article, and
it would have certainly survived an AFD

I think we have enough reasons for its restoration. Abecedare (talk) 23:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Jimfbleak is going to be nominating me for RfA soon. (It says he did already, but it's a link to my old RfA.) When he does that, would you mind being a co-nom? It would be very helpful. Thanks. Undeath (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Report request

Hi Rudget, I'd like to request a WikiProject report on Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games. If you're interested in doing one, please reply on WT:VG. Cheers, JACO PLANE • 2008-03-13 23:13

I second this request :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA - Discospinster

Thank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster _talk 23:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you

Hi Rudget :)! Thank-you for the wonderful comments.

I hope I can perform in the role of an admin to a standard that truly validates

your co-nomination in my RfA and everyone else's support (91/1/1).

Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 11:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:121.220.221.159

LOL. I think I'm one step behind you. I thought I was reverting that IP's vandalism and adding messages to the talk page. Then I go back to the article and see that I actually didn't revert it, but you did, but my warning still went through. Go figure. I was only checking their other edits, I'm not following you, I swear... :) Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

userpage

"...where me and a few other administrators close cases..." Hmm... "me" → "I"?? (and no, I'm not a grammar freak ;))--PeaceNT (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA - Toddst1

Hi Rudget, thanks for supporting my RfA, which passed with 42 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutrals. I'm pleased that the Wikipedia community has trusted me with the mop and I take it very seriously. Of course, special thanks goes to my nominator, Kakofonous. I also appreciate the congratulations. Cheers! Toddst1 (talk) 15:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resilience (network)

Hi, sorry about the unintentional copyvio. Am currently splitting the portmanteau page that was at Resilience. I guess isolating the network section in a new page brought it to the bot's attention. Anyway, I've changed the copy. Please drop me a note if I should do anything else. --AndrewHowse (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

My apologies for the delay I've been busy and gone for a few days. Thanks for participating in the RfA, you did bring up some valid points which I'm keeping in mind going forward. No hard feelings and I'm always open to comments about my admin work. Sincerely – Zedla (talk) 02:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]