User talk:Catfish Jim and the soapdish/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pag collection - Tonnes de flashs (13CD)

Quite right, and I've restored it. All the timestamps are the same, so it looks like it was a timing issue - I hadn't seen your decline. Thanks for the heads up. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Bloody Knuckles

Hi Catfish Jim, I appreciate the work you do and have a question: Why did you delete the Bloody Knuckles page, which I created a few years ago to explain the rules and also to sort out the different versions of drinking, card, and fisticuffs games people play called Bloody Knuckles? I don't know whether the page got vandalized, but I believe it was a useful page and suspect speedy deleting it was erroneous. Thinker jones (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Thinker Jones. It's actually been deleted four times: once before you created it, next as per an AFD consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Knuckles, then twice as per CSD-G4, as it had been previously deleted at AFD. I suggest that WP:DRV would be the best place to make a case for this article to be included. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 23:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

Robert Calvert (saxophonist)

Jim
As the principal contributer to the Catapilla article, I wonder if you could add anything, or correct any obvious mistakes in the article on Robert Calvert (saxophonist) I have started? Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm afraid I know little about Catapilla, I merely formatted the article and added references to strengthen the article as it had been nominated for deletion. The band were notable as per the criteria in WP:MUS, but the article wasn't emphasising it sufficiently. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 10:56, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Youtube Link in Haggis

Having contributed to so many GAs, you must understand that Youtube links are not generally allowed. I also note that the link seems to be dead, as the page to which it directs has nothing to do with Haggis. Please do not re-insert the link in question into Haggis. If you feel that this link should be given an exception to the general prohibition on Youtube links, and you can find a live link to the actual material, please bring the matter up on the talk page. Thank you very much. Ebikeguy (talk) 02:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Oops. I see you are a sysop. Still, your revert is perplexing. Perhaps you did not notice what I had done in your mass revert of many edits by many editors. I stand by my removal of the dead Youtube link. Please respond prior to reverting if you disagree. Ebikeguy (talk) 03:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Yep, admin rights doesn't give you immunity from making dumb errors. Apologies. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 10:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the response, and for keeping an eye on Haggis. Cheers, Ebikeguy (talk) 16:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
That was a funny edit on your UserPage. I hope I did not drive you over the edge. Cheers, Ebikeguy (talk) 16:47, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
lol... One of the problems with the way Wikipedia is set up is that adminship is evidently seen by some as a status symbol or a badge of honour (or something like that). This leads to people nominating themselves for RfA for the wrong reasons and long before they are ready, leading to some of the trainwrecks you see there. I'm monitoring a new editor who appears to be preparing for an RfA and, to avoid confusion on his part if I have to deal with him directly, I wanted to remove the suggestion from my user page that adminship was a "promotion". Catfish Jim and the soapdish 19:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

Talkback

Hello, Catfish Jim and the soapdish. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 23:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 23:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it's on my watchlist. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 01:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Your input

Hey. There's a list: List of Maryland music people who are supposed to be notable. In viewing it briefly, I noticed quite a few things that I don't think are appropriate. First off, I'd think it should be titled, List of musicians from Maryland. But that isn't the issue as much as there are a lot of people listed who are not in the Wikipedia at all! Notability is one of the cornerstones in Wikipedia! I understand if it's a person who is a member of a band, but doesn't have an individual page, but I strongly feel the others who are all listed in red should be removed. What do you think? Would this be a kind of thing resolvable by an Rfc kind of thing, or.. ?? Thanks. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

People included in lists need to satisfy the notability guidelines for individual people as per Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Lists of people. The appropriate action is covered by Wikipedia:Be bold. Essentially I would remove everyone who doesn't have an individual article page and explain my actions briefly in the edit summary and in detail on the talk page, linking to the appropriate policy. But that's up to you. I doubt your action will generate any controversy, but if it does, give me a shout. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 10:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Catfish Jim and the soapdish. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 14:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

To discontinue, simply tell me on my talk page.—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 14:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Catfish Jim and the soapdish. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 21:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 21:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

Steering clear completely

I am now completely steering clear from WP:PERM pages.—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 19:32, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Mentor Page

Feel free to ask me questions like what would I do if I had the power to block users.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 13:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Questions like that are a long way off, but I've added some more general questions. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 14:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Alessandro Matri

Earlier on AIV you responded to a report about this user that was posted from my account. It was posted because of a known glitch in Huggle. I reverted something this user wrote, and Huggle detected that the user had already been reported at UAA, so it automatically reported them at AIV. It will do this even when the user has no warnings. I've complained about the issue, but no luck so far. Calabe1992 18:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. He's since been indefinitely blocked by Orange Mike as he's impersonating an Italian footballer... not something I have a great deal of knowledge of! Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

G7 deletion

Hi Catfish Jim,

You just declined the speedy tag on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/KFC, presumably because Carbonrodney was not the only contributor to the page. As the only other contributor, I support the deletion and have added the tag back in - the discussion has been moved to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Feureau/UserBox/Pizza Hut instead. Cheers, Yunshui 雲‍水 11:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I've deleted it and commented at the new MFD discussion. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 12:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Yunshui 雲‍水 12:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

unblock

Hi im Sawant Mukta can u pls unblock my account. it would b a great thing.--116.202.172.214 (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

You have to log in as User:Sawant Mukta and appeal at User talk:Sawant Mukta as directed in the block message. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

SPI

A happy New Year to you. I'm afraid I am quite unfamiliar with this process and may have misunderstood the template syntax. Yes, I intended to report another Nimbley suspected SP. I have moved it to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nimbley6/Archive - although that does not seem like the correct place either. (See my last edit but one). Further hints gratefully received. Ben MacDui 19:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC) PS and moved again to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nimbley6. What fun. Ben MacDui 19:36, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

István Fekete Primary School

Hi Jim,

Wouldn't a school come under the heading of being an organization?

Too late now, anyway, it must go AfD or PROD if it's been denied CSD. Since it seems pretty likely to be deleted anyway I was just trying to save unnecessary paperwork (the discussion has had plenty of time on its talk pages and at WP:PNT#István Fekete Primary School).

Best wishes Si Trew (talk) 14:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

No, schools are specifically exempt. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7. If you're interested why they're exempt have a look at: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Criteria for Speedy Deletion A7
Cheers Catfish Jim and the soapdish 14:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Bradjw (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I created this article on behalf of Lesley Stowe Fine Foods. The content is taken directly from the co's website (which it owns) and is fully sanctioned by Lesley (ergo, there is no copyright infringement). Pls. let me know how you wish me to proceed...

For - and on behalf of - Lesley Stowe Fine Foods,

Brad J. Winter

Any copyrighted work must be released under a free license such as the Creative Commons license in order to be used on Wikipedia, with certain very limited exceptions. Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials has a guide on how to donate material.
That said, Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of advertising or promotion. If your intent is to advertise for Stowe, it will not be tolerated here. Furthermore, if you work for her company, you have a conflict of interest and would not be able to write objectively on the topic, which is a core aim of Wikipedia. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

To clarify, I am not an employee of the co. and have - under Lesley's instructions - merely copied and pasted the biographical text from her website. There is no intention to advertise and - IMHO - feel that the content provides a concise, unbiased description of this individual.

Reinstating Lesley Stowe's page

I'm completely unsure of what's going on here. The page I created for Lesley (Lesley Stowe Fine Foods) has been deleted and (further to the exchange below) I would like to know what I need to do in order to reinstate it. The last message I received thru My Talk was to inform me that I had inadvertently removed the speedy deletion tag which, I believe, must have occurred when I copied and pasted the content back into the body. Admittedly, I'm a novice and would simply like to know how to get Lesley's page up-and-running again. Pls. advise at your earliest convenience. Many thx., Brad

It was deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement as it was a direct copy and paste of http://lesleystowe.com/about/lesley/
There is information below on how to use copyrighted material on Wikipedia, but before you attempt that, have a read of WP:N. Can you demonstrate notability through significant coverage in reliable sources? Catfish Jim and the soapdish 00:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Thx. Jim. I'll try to get my head around this and will revert back to you should I have any further questions. Cheers, User talk:Bradjw —Preceding undated comment added 01:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC).

Hi Jim. I think I'm getting the hang of this! FYI - I found a page on a contemporary of Lesley's and now see what improvements need to be made. My question is, once I have the page ready for publication, do I simply "create" it and await administrative feedback? Naturally, if there's a step(s) to reinstatement I'm missing, pls. let me know. Cheers, User talk:Bradjw 19:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Fairbanks-Morse

Can you please restore Talk:Fairbanks-Morse (I've already re-created an associated redirect). This (assuming its content was appropriate) should never have been deleted under G8, but it was vandal-moved this morning and so there might not have been a live page present at the time. Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 15:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. There were a whole load of redirects that that were also deleted. I'll see what I can do to restore them. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Verizon vandal

Actually, User:108.32.102.122 is the Verizon vandal. One of her hallmarks is making weird random lists of things. Her other one is adding numerous wikilinks to common words, as seen in the filtered edit. Best, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

A little humor for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
It's always good to have admins who know when they are vandalizing their own page. :) —cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 01:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
lol... yep, sometimes I forget how Twinkle fills in the edit summaries. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 07:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I will stuck on the airplane for 9 hours in just a few hours. I should be able to read the page on board.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 12:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Alabama Moon (film)

Please see User_talk:Moonriddengirl#Alabama_Moon_.28film.29. It may be reverse copyvio. If you are sure, fine, but it isn't clear to me.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 19:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The plot synopsis, introduced with this diff, appears to be largely lifted from an official version. I deleted the apparently copyvio plot to avoid having the article deleted. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 22:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Holly Miranda

Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Pictish stones

It is a pity that you removed the results of my investigation about the Congash Stones. I worked together with Richard Feachem, the author of "Prehistoric Scotland" (I was concerned with the right coordinates of maps). When yo see the enclosure and the position of the two stones as portal stones and you consider the slight remains of the central chapel, my conclusion is pretty sure. Perhaps you will consider to undo the removalRomeinsekeizer (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The main concern here is the source provided, which appears to be a book about a dutch comic book character. This cannot be regarded as a reliable source for this material. It also appears to have been authored by yourself. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Catfish_Jim_and_the_soapdish/Archive_7&oldid=1146576138"