User talk:Carmichael/Archive 2

[title goes here]?

what's your problem ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.231.50.64 (talk) 23:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Please check your talk page. I have posted a message in regards to your edits. Carmichael^{95<speak·check·chill>} 02:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

in response to your message

Hi,

Not sure why it was removed or considered "Wikipedia vandalism." Just trying to expand the stub and provide useful links. Curious007 (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

removed links in error

I have reviewed Wikipedia's Vandalism guidelines and the edit does not fall into any category listed. There were no attempts to to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. There was no gratuitous humor, nonsense or obscenity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curious007 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

reversed edit

Thanks.

(By the way, thank you for doing what you're doing. Must take a lot of work and dedication.) Curious007 (talk) 03:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

THANKS

Thanks for the info and Happy New Year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curious007 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC) Curious007 (talk) 04:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

ACC User Request

I have requested an account on the ACC account creation interface and this is the confirmation edit needed to process the request. Thanks! Carmichael95^{If there was a problem yo I'll solve it} 07:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Shell ^babelfish 19:07, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Game of the year Article

review score not award. it should removed from game of the year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.6.107.73 (talk) 02:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

You should consider discussing your edit on the article's talk page because another user reverted your edit shortly after you changed it again. However, this does not mean that your contributions are not welcome, we just have to make sure there is consensus among editors. Let me know if you need help with anything else! Carmichael95^{If there was a problem yo I'll solve it} 19:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

user Arky91

Hi. Thank you for reverting the gross language used by said editor on my talkpage. Editors are given ample warning that any incivility will be reported straight to administrators when they choose to edit my page. As a result I have reported User:Arky91 to the Administrators noticeboard. Feel free to comment if you wish. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Sir Abdool Raman Osman

This is a strictly false page and i have deleted most of part it .Please make sure it is deleted entirely as this is misleading . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pritish120 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

[Untitled]

Why do you go around on your bot all day? Just asking —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.93.83.54 (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

I can delete whatever I want from my talk page, stop vandalising it by readding your incorrect wsrnongs, or ill report you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.93.83.54 (talk) 03:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

What is your name?

I want to talk with you about trying to hid the truth about Eleanora McBean. She murder my kid and you are trying to cover up the facts! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.15.253 (talk) 23:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

re: William Goodchild.

Dear Sir:

I do not understand why my edits are being removed. I'm trying to be contsructive.

All the best,

Andy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.251.85 (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spencir Bridges, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- CyberDiablo 16:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

After looking over the article's edit history, I figured what had happened and manually fixed it myself. A lot of reverting was going on due to vandalism and I had accidentally reverted to a version that included some vandalism. I am going to strike-through this warning as it was automatically issues on your behalf and doesn't necessarily apply in this situation. Thanks for catching this, much appreciated! Carmichael95 (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Ummmm....

What did I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.45.117 (talk) 07:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

You can not add, "iWhore is also a money grubbing bitch. " - this is against Wikipedia's policy on biography of living people. Carmichael95 [TALK] | [CONTRIBS] 20:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Question

What did I do wrong on my recent edit to TinyGrab's Wikipedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.160.171 (talk) 07:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

You changed the article's image from tinygrab's logo to a image of a nipple and that is not necessary and is considered vandalism. Carmichael95 [TALK] | [CONTRIBS] 20:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The editing of birdo

I am sorry for "Vandalizing", but I know the most about Mario, besides creator Shigeru Miyamoto. So I just wanted to correct whoever agrees with her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.222.67 (talk) 03:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Now I realize I need to look under "vandalism" category. Thanks user who mentioned that! ;D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.222.67 (talk) 03:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

... ... so... ... why was my contribution vandalizing?

The content that you added was reverted because of the way you had phrased the ending of your addition, "Geez, stupid Reitz should know a thing or two about mario before she reveals her retarded harpiness" - this is not acceptable in the article itself, however you are more than welcome to talk about the article on it's talk page. Carmichael95 [TALK] | [CONTRIBS] 20:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Here is the secret buddy.

The Secret is a best-selling 2006 self-help book written by Rhonda Byrne and based upon William Walker Atkinson's prior works and school of thought, based on the notion that people are greedy and curious and will thus pay for anything that sounds like a formula for getting rich, and thus making the author rich instead of the reader.

This is not vandalism.

This is a fact that is allready verified in the article itself, as it states that the book was best-selling in the year 2006. A best-selling book will unavoidably earn the author wealth. The reader does allso have to pay for the book. Thus a best-selling book will technically make the author richer and the buyer poorer. That is how economics work.

And that is the secret.

Not being able to see through this, makes wikipedia look very, very stupid indeed, and even more so when you attempt to hide economic realities from your readers. Witch in it self judicially could be considered scamming or coersion.

So just let it go buddy. My addition is verifiable by it`s own and wikipedias logic.

46.212.14.115 (talk) 03:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry but your edits were not constructive in terms of making the article better and accurate...they seemed to be more like making assumptions. If you are going to add content like that you need verifiable sources and then you are more than welcome to make contributions to the article. Carmichael95 [TALK] | [CONTRIBS] 19:57, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

[Untitled]

Okay, I'm sorry, I have a bad habit of doing re-posts. :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.222.67 (talk) 03:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Umm

Im not sure what I did there, but ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by EcentiallyDeeDeeDee (talk • contribs) 19:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

My apologies...I did not realize you were replacing the content of a user's talk page. However, I reverted myself so the changes you made were reflected.Carmichael95 [TALK] | [CONTRIBS] 19:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)