User talk:CandyCola4444

This is CandyCola4444's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gauda conquest of Kamarup (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Geardona was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gauda conquest of Kamarup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 21:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CandyCola4444! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Geardona (talk to me?) 21:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gauda conquest of Kamarup (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gauda conquest of Kamarup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 16:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gauda/Gupta invasion of Kannauj[edit]

Hi @CandyCola4444.

I have moved the article back to Draftspace as it is not ready for Mainspace yet. It needs copy-editing throughout and re-writing to conform to our voice and manual of style.

Let me know if you have any questions, Qcne (talk) 15:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did CandyCola4444 (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CandyCola4444 no. You should not have moved it back to Mainspace. There are grammatical and spelling errors in the first sentence! It needs a total re-write.

Please do not move it back to Mainspace. Instead, submit it for Review by clicking the big blue Submit the draft for review! button. But not until you have corrected the spelling errors throughout. Qcne (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can i move it directly to article page by fixing all the errors? CandyCola4444 (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CandyCola4444 No, fix the errors first then I would still suggest Submitting it for Review instead of moving it yourself. Qcne (talk) 16:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but i took 2-3 to getting accepted in wikipedia i will fix the errors CandyCola4444 (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop! Stop moving the article, it is full of spelling and grammatical errors. Fix the errors FIRST. Qcne (talk) 18:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bruh i really fixed everything CandyCola4444 (talk) 05:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh, you did not, there are spelling errors throughout. Qcne (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

which category? CandyCola4444 (talk) 08:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what? Qcne (talk) 08:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne I don't think they'll understand as he seems to be a newcomer. I do suspect a meatpuppetry behind all these, randomly few users are new actively editing similar areas. Unfortunately, most of them contains WP:OR and poorly sourced materials. Imperial ^[AFCND] 18:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chola raid on Rarh moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Chola raid on Rarh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Believe you meant this for draft space based on the templates. Will move and submit for review.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 08:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept my draft CandyCola4444 (talk) 08:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chola raid on Rarh (April 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chola raid on Rarh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmapala's invasion of Kannauj moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Dharmapala's invasion of Kannauj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CandyCola4444 Similarly Draft:Battle of Devarkonda moved to draftspace, as the title is an invented name, and the context is barely notable. Please add the context to appropriate parent articles. Regards. Imperial ^[AFCND] 18:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dharmapala's invasion of Kannauj (April 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Tripartite Struggle instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The actual invasion is only a small section of this article, the event itself does not meet WP:N.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dharmapala's invasion of Kannauj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Pala invasion of Kannauj[edit]

Hello CandyCola4444, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pala invasion of Kannauj, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pala invasion of Kannauj.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MicrobiologyMarcus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 13:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Chola raid on Rarh, you may be blocked from editing. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Pala invasion of Odisha, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Johand¹⁹⁹ ^(Talk) 12:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Chola raid on Rarh. Imperial ^[AFCND] 18:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CandyCola4444, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as ORIONIS EQUINOX (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppetry[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CandyCola4444. Thank you. Imperial ^[AFCND] 19:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello CandyCola4444! Your additions to Battle of Devarakonda have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kharavela's conquests and invasions[edit]

Hello CandyCola4444, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kharavela's conquests and invasions, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kharavela's conquests and invasions.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jayapala (Pala dynasty) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jayapala (Pala dynasty). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it has too many problems of language or grammar and If this article is about Jayapala, why is all the material about Devapala?. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright reminder[edit]

Your edit to Sena revolution of Bengal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sena dynasty into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Gauda-Maukhari conflicts has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jayapala (Pala dynasty)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jayapala (Pala dynasty) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/stream/dynastic-history-of-magadha-cir.-450-1200-a.-d./Dynastic%20History%20of%20Magadha%20Cir.%20450-1200%20A.D._djvu.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]