User talk:Callmeau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, people are generally discouraged from writing about themselves or their company on Wikipedia, it's a conflict of interest, as Wikipedia is not for self-promotion and all articles must be neutral and based on reliably published information. At any rate, I have moved the page to User:Callmeau/temp and you can have at it. I suggest you look at WP:CORP, our inclusion guide for articles on corporations, this article does not currently assert meeting it, and will need to do so if it's to be included in Wikipedia. While I'm sure the foundation appreciates your company's donations, article representation on Wikipedia is not for sale. Please note that I'm not a Wikimedia Foundation employee, just a Wikipedia volunteer, so my actions are not necisarrily those of the group your donations went to. --W.marsh 01:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Please add verifiable references to the article, such as newspaper or magazine articles. See Wikipedia:Verifiability --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to 3 (telecommunications), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rob.au 09:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page "CallMe"[edit]

A page you created, or image you uploaded, CallMe, has been deleted in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets the one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable notability guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content; it will be deleted again and may be protected from re-creation. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you – Gurch 18:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Me Australia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jacob Reichman[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jacob Reichman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Acroterion (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jreichman.PNG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jreichman.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]