User talk:Caeculus

Newbage[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Caeculus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --AW 18:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My sock case[edit]

I find your conclusions on my sock case to be fairly unnerving. Rather than give you all the back information, I will just share some information that I think might help. There was no independent evaluation process. The administrator who engaged me in conversation also created the ban and the sock puppet case. I am still befuddled about how you have concluded we are one in the same based on the edit summaries involved. Everyone who was not already involved in the case failed to adhere to the wiki ideology before drawing conclusions (as did the Admin who banned me). WP:AGF seems to get over looked a great deal and I would hope in the future that you consider that before making assumptions and statements. Be well and happy editing.//Tecmobowl 02:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even as he tries to make nice with you and certain others after a week of breaking wikipedia rules without repentance, he is trying to fan the flames further, with a complaint to another admin User talk:^demon. But you knew that. :) Baseball Bugs 04:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's cute. Caeculus talk 05:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This may interest you. As you may recall, Tecmobowl was blocked for sockpuppetry. He was subsequently banned indefinitely. But it appears to some that he is back once again as a sockpuppet -- under the guise of longlevi -- see [1]