User talk:Bugg42

Welcome!

Hello, Bugg42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 19:21, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

POG[edit]

Hey, I had a look at the article, and you're right, I don't think it should have been deleted. There were parts of it that should be removed though: the ones with no reliable sources to back them up. I'm currently working on it at User:Delldot/Box of sand. When I have a really iron-clad article with all unreferenced stuff removed, I'll probably bring it to WP:DRV. Any help you could give by providing news sources and relevant referenced info would be great; go ahead and edit my sandbox all you want. I may not get this done very promptly since i'll be busy with other stuff for the next week, e.g. that free store I mentioned. Anyway, great seeing you again, hopefully see you in October. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, definitely let me know on my talk page if you have any wiki stuff to discuss in the future. Peace, delldot talk 21:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC) P.S. Here's that countervandalism tools page I mentioned. delldot talk 21:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out: Pittsburgh Organizing Group. delldot talk 18:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure on the POG article. Hopefully see you in October, but no luck so far on finding anyone interested in going. Should I email you with developments for medical, or keep emailing Nicole? If the former, use the emailuser function to email me, or enable your own email under "preferences"; I'm not sure I have yours. Ugh, I see what you mean about the POV issues in the DAWN article. That's going to take some work to clean up. Peace, delldot talk 14:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]