User talk:Bond2411

Skanda (2023 film) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Skanda (2023 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It is about a film that is unreleased, and, like most unreleased films, will not be notable until release. Please resubmit with a Plot section and a Reception section after release.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:F3t6KnAXAAAU14F.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:F3t6KnAXAAAU14F.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 11:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:F3t6KnAXAAAU14F.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:F3t6KnAXAAAU14F.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Medhanshch per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medhanshch. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bond2411 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not abused anyone on the wikipedia. You have not specified where did I abuse? Please reconsider the block

Decline reason:

The word "abuse" refers to your inappropriate use of multiple accounts. This is described at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medhanshch. If you have an explanation for these actions, please offer it in a new request. 331dot (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bond2411 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have multiple accounts, this is my only account, if you think I have multiple accounts, please provide proofs, then i will accept.

Decline reason:

You have already been provided the evidence against you. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medhanshch. Thanks for accepting your block. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bond2411 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See, we have worked on the same page, okay? I have updated only pics, he have edited some text, I have checked the edited part, I don't how you came to conclusion that we are both the same. So if we use same tags we are socketpuppets????

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes- more specifically, a meat puppet. 331dot (talk) 20:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]