User talk:BobBobster1

April 2021[edit]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Jojar S Dhinsa: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Kind regards. —Twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 13:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Please don’t add controversial and/or defamatory content to a BLP without a reliable source. I noticed that some of the claims you added were supposedly sourced to company profiles that did not mention the info - this means the statements are likely what’s called original research, which is not permitted. Please read WP:BLP for our guidelines on contributing to biographies of living people. Let me know on my talk page if you need help :-)Pahunkat (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jojar S Dhinsa have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jojar S Dhinsa was changed by BobBobster1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883294 on 2021-04-10T14:12:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jojar S Dhinsa, you may be blocked from editing. Tame (talk) 10:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not disruptive, it's removing unsourced nonsense. BobBobster1 (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adequate explanation 1: →‎Career: no evidence the company exists, turnover figures from self-published website, no evidence again for charitable or humanitarian projects

Adequate explanation 2: No evidence of any charitable or humanitarian projects

BobBobster1 (talk) 10:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Jojar S Dhinsa.The discussion is about the topic Jojar S Dhinsa. Thank you. --WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TNT ^💞 01:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TNT: where can I find the discussion about my sockpuppet ban? BobBobster1 (talk) 07:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cash FX (June 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not only does this not meet notability guidelines based on references failing WP:ORGCRIT, but it must be written from a WP:NPOV. The tone here gives the impression of WP:RGW.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cash FX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BobBobster1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cash FX Group S.A[edit]

Hello, BobBobster1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cash FX Group S.A, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cash FX Group S.A[edit]

Hello, BobBobster1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cash FX Group S.A".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cash FX[edit]

Hello, BobBobster1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cash FX, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]