User talk:BeIsKr
Welcome!
Hello, BeIsKr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! The Ogre 20:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
I reverted your edit for the time being because using "HaShem" to refer to God in the context of an encyclopedia article presenting a translation of this traditional Jewish prayer accurately reflects traditional Jewish practice. See Names of God in Judaism#HaShem. Feel free to discuss this issue further on Talk:Birkat Hamazon. Best, --Shirahadasha 00:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Looking at the article history I see that you attempted to make this change before and your edit was previously reverted by other editors who disagreed. Given this history, I would urge you to discuss this issue on Talk:Birkat Hamazon and attempt to persuade other editors. I see from your edit summary that you believe use of "HaShem" is inappropriate for Wikipedia articles. I would suggest explaining either on Talk:Birkat Hamazon, or perhaps Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Judaism if you would like this rule applied generally, why you believe this. Please take a look at Wikipedia's consensus policy which explains the importance of discussing issues with other editors when there is a disagreement. Best, --Shirahadasha 00:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Invitation[edit]
Sean Bennett[edit]
You didn't list the article properly at Articles for Deletion. I'll do it for you since I think the article could stand to be deleted too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
You made an edit to Birkat Hachamah where you wrote "....Birkat HaHammah will always fall on March 26 in the Julian calendar."
Don't you mean April 8?
Ariel. (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
No, the Julian calendar is currently offset from the Gregorian calendar by 13 days.
BeIsKr (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Ah! Thanks. Ariel. (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you took the photo that's in the infobox at Damascus Gate. I added a photo I took on Monday lower down. I'm curious, do you know why the wall looks so much whiter in my photo? (Keep in mind, other than a few summer-camp photography classes in my youth, I don't know the first thing about photography.) Also, kind of funny how that pole is sticking out in the same position in both our photos, although it looks like it changed a little since 2007.—Biosketch (talk) 12:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Interesting. My first thought was you just took yours on a brighter day, but then I noticed that the top of the gate is a much darker color in mine. I don't know if they cleaned it or what. I'm going back there in April, so maybe I'll check it out then. And btw, my photo was taken in May 2005 (which I list on the description page). BeIsKr (talk) 08:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok. I was back there last week, and yeah, it definitely looks like they cleaned the walls since I took the photo in 2005. BeIsKr (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting[edit]
 |
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | |
|---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England! | ||
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
Boston Wiknic[edit]
 |
Great American Wiknic - Boston | |
|---|---|---|
| The Second Annual Great American Wiknic will be an opportunity for Wikipedians across the Greater Boston area to meet for an afternoon of Food, Fun, and Fellowship. Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about upcoming activities, and just enjoy a day at the park! | ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wiknic/2012! | ||
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 19:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC).
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard[edit]
| U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
i noticed that you remove the whole contents which i added, please refer to the discussion to know why the destination table was removed User talk:Kingroyos#Sir Seewoosagur_Ramgoolam International Airport.Kingroyos (talk) 08:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting[edit]
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18[edit]
| NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5 | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March[edit]
| Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk) |
You're invited![edit]
| NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Edit-a-thon invite[edit]
On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Notification of automated file description generation[edit]
Your upload of File:Cinder Cone Cauldron.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
References for Mockingjay Part 2[edit]
I'm curious, why are you cleaning out references for Mockingjay Part 2? It has not been released yet. I can possibly see it for characters that are in Part 1, since they were shot together, but isn't it a little premature for Part 2, and were they hurting anything by being there? Elizium23 (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- See discussion on the Talk page over there. My intent was only to clean out references for characters in Part 1 for that very reason. If I accidentally cleaned out anything for a character who didn't appear in a prior movie, feel free to put it back in. BeIsKr (talk) 20:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA[edit]
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, BeIsKr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA[edit]
| Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
August 2017[edit]
Hello, I'm AlexTheWhovian. I noticed that you recently removed content from Game of Thrones (season 7) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- AlexTW 07:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Per WP:TVPLOT a broadcast TV show can serve as the source for its own plot summary. Therefore, it should also be able to serve as the source for its own cast list. Consequently, it is not necessary to cite 20 different sources for the cast list of GoT Season 7 once episodes have aired and the cast list can be verified through the show's own credits. I'm reverting your change. BeIsKr (talk) 02:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Plot summary is not the cast, and it does not say that it can also support the cast. If you wish to gain consensus for that, and add it into the Manual of Style for Television, I would recommend starting a new threat there and gaining support for it. This is not the first occurrence of this sort of edit - also see Talk:Game of Thrones (season 6)#Cast references, and the other link provided in that same discussion. While the edit is under dispute, please allow the status quo to remain and any discussions related to it to conclude. Cheers. -- AlexTW 03:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, BeIsKr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, BeIsKr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Rolf Steiner[edit]
Hello BeIsKr. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rolf Steiner, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Take this to Afd, please - its a borderline case, but doesn't appear to be vanity or self promotion (although I could be wrong). Thank you. KillerChihuahua 16:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
A heads-up[edit]
You started Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolf Steiner. I called for premature closure, because, in my opinion, there is no way it will close as anything but a keep.
You could do everyone a favour, and withdraw the nomination. Alternately, provide a further justification for deletion. Normally the AFD would run for six more days. But if you withdraw the nomination, showing you accept it will close as keep, you save the time of everyone who looks at the discussion over the next six days.
Um, can I ask whether you were aware of WP:BEFORE? It gives guidance for those considering nominating an article for deletion, on how to confirm or refute whether the underlying topic of an article measures up to our inclusion standards. When we have a very weak article on a topic that is, nevertheless, notable, we keep the weak article, and improve it, or tag it for improvement. We don't delete weak articles on notable topics.
And, as in this particular case, we don't delete an under-referenced article, when a web search confirms there are good references out there.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- You left this comment about two hours after I left you this note. I am leaving you a followup, as per my comments in Every question, every disagreement, is a teachable moment.
- Sadly, a lot people we meet in real life, and some of the people we will encounter here on the wikipedia, are either unwilling or unable to consider the possibility they made a mistake, or they are unwilling or unable to openly acknowledge mistakes after they realize they made them. Please don't follow that example. Personally, I do my very best to give fair consideration to the arguments made by people I disagree with. I think I do an okay job at that. And if, after fair consideration, their arguments convinced me, I do my best to openly acknowledge I was convinced. Sadly, in real life, and here on the wikipedia, we will encounter people who will stick to their guns, even after they realize they made a mistake. If they realize they made a mistake, and think the other guy is a weak arguer, or they have other people on their side, they will stick to their guns, and try to "win" that argument, anyhow. Well, the project is hurt, we are all hurt, when someone keeps trying to "win" an argument, even after they realize they are wrong.
- You wrote "why would being mentioned for a paragraph or two in a few books satisfy WP:GNG? If he had a chapter devoted to him in a book or two, fine, but the fact that he's mentioned in passing doesn't seem like notability."
Hold on, we both know there is an entire book, first published in 1983, devoted to Steiner. Nowadays, what with Lulu, and similar publishers, the bar to self-publishing a book is low. But Steiner's book was published in 1983, before online self-publishing. Do you know the half-life of books? Around 1983 I read an interview with the founder of Project Gutenberg. He said that most books go out of print within five years. That Steiner's book remains in print, for over 35 years, establishes his notability, establishes it wasn't a non-notable flash-in-the-pan vanity publication.
- If you really want to help build the wikipedia, do your best to learn from your mistakes. It is our obligation to do what is best for the project, even when that requires acknowledging mistakes. Acknowledging mistakes helps reinforce the trust a cooperative project requires. Geo Swan (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |