User talk:Bdhook

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talkback[edit]

Please Insert Talkback tags here.

Current Projects[edit]

The Last Chronicle of Barset[edit]

I am currently working on collecting materials to update this Wikipedia entry on Anthony Trollope's novel. This project has been taken on as part of a special assignment in a Modern English Literature course at Kansas City Kansas Community College. This assignment is being completed under the guidance of Associate Professor Adam Hadley. If you have any questions or input regarding my work on this entry, please place comments here. Thanks! Bdhook (talk) 20:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see someone working on Trollope. I've done articles on several of the novels (and actually got The Vicar of Bullhampton to GA status), but have lately been occupied elsewhere and haven't had the time to work in that corner of Wikipedia. Will be watching Last Chronicle, however, and am eager to see what you make of the article. Good luck! Ammodramus (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and a quick note: In writing about Last Chronicle, you'll be making frequent references to the financial instrument that Crawley allegedly stole. Per MOS:TIES, it's a "cheque". I got dinged for that after editing The Way We Live Now, in which a check cheque also gets stolen. Also, per WP:STRONGNAT, dates in the text should be in DMY format (e.g. 20 March 2012), although it's acceptable to use YYYY-MM-DD format in the footnotes. Ammodramus (talk) 21:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've started editing The Last Chronicle of Barset following the examples of The Warden and Barchester Towers.

These are not good examples to follow. If you'll look at the talk pages, you'll see that they're rated as Start-class: this means that they're beyond stubs, but not by much. Articles about novels should follow the guidelines set out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/ArticleTemplate; and you'll notice that on those guidelines, the plot summary should be brief, and there's no place for a list of characters. Instead, we need a lot of stuff about the novel's writing history and background, publishing history, contemporary and current reception, major themes, etc., etc. All of this needs to come from cited sources—WP:NOR expressly forbids your including your own thoughts and opinions about the work's quality, themes, significance, etc.

Rather than going through the novel and making your summary of its contents and your list of its characters longer and more detailed, you need to be going through Trollope biographies, critical essays, and the like. Remember that a WP article isn't supposed to be your essay about the novel; it should be a well-sourced distillation of what reliable sources say about it.

If I may suggest: a great many literary scholars see Mr. Crawley as a portrait of Trollope's own father. That's something that should probably be brought into the article. You might also note the contemporary reaction to the news that the Barsetshire series was over: there was considerable despair among Trollope's readership. Ammodramus (talk) 22:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and: If you're linking to an online version of Last Chronicle, could I suggest that you use the University of Adelaide version (see the external links)? That allows you to link directly to the chapter, so the reader doesn't land at the Project Gutenberg page and then have to decide whether to download a version of the novel. Ammodramus (talk) 22:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come to the First Topeka Meetup, January 15![edit]

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:24, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming event at the WWI Museum in Kansas City[edit]

Hello! I would like to invite you to a Wikipedia editathon about WWI and Dissent on November 22 at the National World War I Museum in Kansas City. Join us for the U.S. branch of this international event as we write more social history from the era around WWI into Wikipedia! All editors are welcome, contributors to topics around WWI other than Dissent also encouraged! Food and drinks will be supplied by the WWI museum, Sadads (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Grand Lodge[edit]

Template:Infobox Grand Lodge has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 00:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed[edit]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.


Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

File permission problem with File:KSSB Seal.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:KSSB Seal.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]