User talk:BariumBasin

Welcome!

Hello, BariumBasin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Final World Order, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Toddst1 (talk) 22:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Final World Order[edit]

The article Final World Order has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NN neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 22:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Abiogenic petroleum origin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Final World Order for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Final World Order, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final World Order until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 02:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Abiogenic petroleum origin. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 06:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Abiogenic petroleum origin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 07:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from one Wikipedia article to another[edit]

When you do this you must attribute your edit to the old article, preferably in the edit summary, to allow contributions by editors to be traced. Not doing this is a copyright violation. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 09:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]