User talk:Atiqul Islam Sakib

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at International Cricket Council‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sir, I created a page but why it isn’t published yet?? Can you please help me? Atiqul Islam Sakib (talk) 10:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamdard Public College (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NSCHOOL, requires significant coverage (not merely inclusions in list/directories) in multiple independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Atiqul Islam Sakib! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamdard Public College (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Nothing added to improve sourcing or demonstrate notability following earlier decline. Please do not re-submit without addressing the issues raised or it may be rejected (as against declined for improvement).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamdard Public College (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vinegarymass911. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Directorate General of Forces Intelligence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamdard Public College (December 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Press releases are not reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamdard Public College (January 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hamdard Public College instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad Ali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Muhammad Ali, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. He was made an honorary citizen of Bangladesh, but he was legally an American citizen all his life. Doug Weller talk 13:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Solomon in Islam, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 13:41, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Asif Akbar (Film Director)[edit]

Hello, Atiqul Islam Sakib,

Thank you for creating Asif Akbar (Film Director).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Imdb is not accepted as a reliable source. See WP:IMDB-EL

More sources - are necessary.
Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.

  1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
  2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
  3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
  4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asif Akbar (Film Director) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asif Akbar (Film Director) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Akbar (Film Director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hamdard Public College[edit]

Hello, Atiqul Islam Sakib. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hamdard Public College".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 08:18, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Bangladeshis by net worth for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Bangladeshis by net worth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bangladeshis by net worth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove editing permission for this user.[edit]

This user recently edited the page for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi somehow, even though the page is edit-protected. They added in information stating that al-Baghdadi was Jewish. They cited three sources, NONE of which stated that Baghdadi was Jewish. This person is likely has an anti-semitic agenda and is pushing a conspiracy theory devoid of credibility. They should not be allowed to add any information on Wikipedia, especially given their past history of disruptive edits.

Wikipedia is one of the last places on the internet that is a space where truth and reason are respected. Please do not let it be hijacked so easily. 73.227.5.162 (talk) 03:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Calling anti-semitic someone who's telling the truth is the major weapon for some groups of people and I don’t even care of them. I'm editing Wikipedia, creating and translating since 2018. It's not even a matter. The matter is, All editors have right and power to put informations that they have found from internet and sources. I'm not telling about Al Baghdadi if he's jewish or not but in Internet there are tons of information that Baghdadi was trained under by Mossad and also In recent report of a Israel’s Institution, It is clearly shows that Baghdadi was Jewish. I don’t know if it’s true or not. That's why I have put the Institute's name and the statements of the report were in a pdf file. That's why you all have to download it for your knowledge.


Moreover, Taking away someone's editing rights is also a human rights violation and I think you have violated that. If you like the edit or find it fake then give your opinion about it. Who gave you the right to insult someone as antisemitic? This attitude is also reprehensible. thank you Atiqul Islam Sakib (talk) 10:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added one more source for the 'Baghdadi is Jewish' claim. Still, I see NOTHING in ANY of the sources (yes I have read through your sources) stating that he was Jewish. You have proof that this 'report' shows he was Jewish? Then where is it? Add it to the source list then.

And me complaining about your editing permission and asking for it to be revoked is a human rights violation? Grow up. Seriously? You haven't even had your permission removed. Just some random person on the internet (me) asking for it to be removed is a human rights violation? That is a joke. You must suffer human rights violations every time you're talking to someone in real life and you get interrupted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoughEndofthePineapple (talk • contribs) 13:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you're struggling to understand me. I said before that I don’t know if he's jewish or not but lots of people like edward snowden claimed that he was a jewish and a mossad agent and I've put this information in the sources. I didn’t edit there like "Baghdadi was Jewish", I edited it like " In a recent report".. The report was in a pdf formate and pdf formats can't be added in Wikipedia's source section and that's why I wrote down other sources... I didn’t put anything wrong and It's a disputed statement. Check twitter or any other social apps where a tons people like politicians, journalists etc claiming that Baghdadi was a mossad agent...

And of course you tried to violate human rights. All your words are vindictive. Demanding that my writing permissions be turned off is nothing but stupidy. How many edits have you done so far? What is your contribution to Wikipedia? Your ID is brand new. So it is better to be careful before saying anything. Very few people have the ability to understand this so grow up first. It's better to not to show extremism in this peaceful Journal site. So be aware of it. I hope you'll be ok and will contribute to Wikipedia like prominents! Thank you.

Atiqul Islam Sakib (talk) 16:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the point remains that you can't just assert 'Baghdadi is Jewish' while citing to sources that don't state that fact, and their your defense is 'It was in a report, which I can't cite'. What about citing a source that talks about that supposed report and supports the fact. It doesn't matter whether you are stating 'Baghdadi is Jewish' or 'A report found that Baghdadi was Jewish'. Either way, without citing to an actual source that states that, you can't just argue 'Trust me. I know a report states this. But I won't offer any proof'.
I concede that the sources you cite (while I think they are bad sources) allege that Al-Baghdadi was a Mossad agent. So sure, leave that in for now. But I think you should at least cut out the part which states that he was Jewish, because NONE of the sources state that. Unless you find a source that does. Also, the grammar of your sentence in the article is completely messed up.
Take this for example: Imagine I am going to create an article about myself and write as information that 'I am the head of the UN according to a report from the UN'. But I don't cite that report, nor do I cite a source that discusses that report. Is that believable? I am making up this example to illustrate the illogical nature of stating such a controversial statement without any valid sources that state your viewpoint.
You can choose to express what you express. Perhaps arguing for you to be banned was an emotional and rash response. But the fact remains that the proposition you put into the article is not supported by any source you cited. And it's not going to help your case just because you add more sources unless you finally add at least ONE source that states 'A report states that Baghdadi was Jewish". RoughEndofthePineapple (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For instance, you state that 'Edward Snowden claimed that he was [a] Jewish'. You cite this article: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2014/aug/19/blog-posting/edward-snowden-leaked-nsa-documents-show-us-israel/ That article doesn't say anything about Snowden stating that Al-Baghdadi was Jewish. In fact the article reaches this conclusion about the 'al_Baghdadi was a Mossad agent' theory: "Yes, this is a conspiracy theory." The article you cite contradicts your statement, rather than supporting it. RoughEndofthePineapple (talk) 18:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at Atiqul Islam Sakib's contributions, they have a history of promoting unsourced fridge conspiracy theories and getting into edit wars when people try to revert their edits. SBA19 (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Washington University of Science and Technology (December 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EID MUBAROK[edit]

Hi how are you? Can you knock me? MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Watchdog journalism[edit]

Hello Atiqul Islam Sakib, you added https://www.goohoo.nl/ goohoo but that seems a website to do with second hand stuff . Can you take a look into this? Thank you ever so much. Lotje (talk) 12:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Identifying reliable sources[edit]

Blogs like blog.bdlove24.com, fb4blog.blogspot.com, and bangladeshi-entertainment.blogspot.com are not reliable sources. Information from them should not be added to Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Atiqul_Islam_Sakib&oldid=1213812303"