User talk:AstroFizMat

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 123wiki456pedija789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

but...[edit]

... you did not provide a source for the LaTeX code you added at Ordinal date. If this is your own work, it is not permitted per policy WP:no original research. The article already suffers from a surfeit of unsourced claims which cannot be verified. Please provide a citation for your own additions and it would be great if you could evidence the existing material that others added. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! How do you mean this? Shall I add a citation to the first formula with a hyperlink of the website of LaTeX or something other? Thank you for help! --123wiki456pedija789 (talk) 15:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What I had in mind is the provenance of the algorithm rather than of the LaTeX project itself. It should be obvious by now that my knowledge of LaTeX is near zero, so it may be that what I am asking is not sensible, like asking you for the provenance of the statement: "the word 'sensible' is spelt s e n s i b l e"! Excuse my ignorance if that is so. Otherwise you might ask for advice at talk:LaTeX. If all else fails, please use the helpme template as described above and a more experienced editor may be able to give you a better pointer. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sunspot drawing moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sunspot drawing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 15:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunspot drawing has been accepted[edit]

Sunspot drawing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunspot drawing[edit]

Hi, thanks for creating an interesting and well written article but can you please fix references 3,4, and 5, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]