User talk:Astral/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

k[edit]

ill stop :)

Good choice. Astral (talk) 04:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
how do i become a good wikipedian like u r astral>>???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.65.136.180 (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest that creating an account might be a good place to start and then the links in my welcome section should get you started :-) Astral (talk) 04:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Oswald[edit]

I was actually going to tag that article the same way you did, but I don't think that it will get deleted. He's a member of a notable band which makes him notable too. The artile is very poor, but I doubt it gets deleted.Undeath (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If he is notable, they can add {{hangon}} and assert his significance, I'm sure. Astral (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beffcake[edit]

The recent edit I made to Star Trek: Of Gods and Men was constructive, the film really did suck. I mean Bill Shatner's last record was bad but this... Astral please do not abuse Wikipedia and vandalise the article Star Trek: Of Gods and Men again or you will be banned. Beffcake. BEEFCAKE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.32.114 (talk) 07:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. You think changing a subject heading to "Beefcake" and then adding statements such as "the film stunk worse than William Shatner's last record deal" (diff) is constructive? I suspect a user blocked the other day with a similar vandalism patten was also you and have taken the appropriate steps to request that this address is blocked also. Perhaps on your third try you can make a positive difference to Wikipedia, rather than just being a jerk. Astral (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, on your third try, you vandalised my message above and added the message below this one. Those were the only "contributions" showing for your IP address. Once again, I have requested that you be blocked. I can keep doing this until you grow up... Astral (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beefcake Vandalism Barnstar[edit]

zT:oOMGnM suk 3lee3 8allz. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.32.114 (talk) 08:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ban the Beef?[edit]

You may ban me on my IP range, You may ban me on TOR, You may ban me on Anonymizers, you may even ban half of Canada. Yet you could never truly ban Beefcake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.2.151 (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind reporting you every time you show up to vandalise my userpage / harass me. I'm more than prepared to keep doing this until you give up... Astral (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cheers[edit]

No problem. Just leave a message if more come, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, Where's the Beef?[edit]

Spellcast and his dark magick tryed to curse the beef. But the beef shall not grow old and moldy until this flame war has ended and 'ST: of Gods and Men' is proven one bad film. Beefcake. BEEFCAKE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.4.89 (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spellcast Countercasted[edit]

As I told Spellcast: this flame war is between you, Beef, and William Shatner. By the way you will notice my IP address is that of a public cyber cafe, therefore BEEFCAKE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.4.89 (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: ASTY[edit]

\o/This user is Astral.

Granted, the one you gave me is more metal. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! 22:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thax for your help[edit]

hey Astral i think you are truly a Wikiheroine to all of us!! But i must tell u that the Bebot article is incorrect. The correct name of the song is Bebop. Can you plz help fix this??

Gossipgirl1 (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the article is correct. Several sources ([1] [2] [3] [4]) all list the track as Bebot and so I believe the page is correct. Oh, and seeing as I'm a guy, I'd be wikihero ;) Astral (talk) 11:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow![edit]

Thax You were right! I also have another source to add if i may...... Wikihero go!

Gossipgirl1 (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope u like this...[edit]

I know that this isn't much, but I wanted to show my gratitude!

look over here!THIS USER ROCKS!!!
Thanks :) Astral (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks[edit]

Um.....hi[edit]

hi, im kinda new here so i wanted to know how you got that sweet graphic on ur user page...

:-)This user is requesting ur help.

Thatshoturnot (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry[edit]

im sorry, i have tourettes WHY WONT U TALK TO MEE!! I LOVE YOU!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivianloi (talkcontribs) 18:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your harasser[edit]

I blocked the IP, but if you want a rangeblock it's probably better to lay out all the evidence at AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice, it's been a while since the last vandalism by this person (but then it was several times in a few days) so I think I'll leave it to see if they do it again and go to AN/I next time :) Astral (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Omg AN/I? Beefcake is scared... no hold on a second, block this IP range and I'll just go to another cyber cafe with a different ISP. Beefcake lives. Honestly dude, just admit Star Trek of Gods and Men sucked and I'll leave this all be... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.16.3 (talk) 07:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And then I can protect this page. No problem. Daniel Case (talk) 07:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Okay... I will no longer "harass" you, edit your page or that of Star Trek Gods of Men. Honestly I'll give up. I'm tired, you won. All though I still think the movie stunk worse then Bill Shatner's last record. Beefcake over and out for good. BEEFCAKE!

February 2008[edit]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! ChetblongT C 04:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Must've been huggle playing up as I warned the user at least twice and huggle shouldn't post to AIV until they have a final warning. I have posted this also on AIV and given the user a level 4 warning. Next time, please could you leave a personal message rather than templating me? Cheers Astral (talk) 04:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. I just became admin today so I'm sorry for the template. If you need any help in the future please contact me. --ChetblongT C 05:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries and congratulations on recieving the mop and bucket, use them well :) Astral (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --ChetblongT C 05:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Jungle[edit]

WP:BRC
Please accept your honorary Bathrobe Cabal Slippers... Of Doom!

Welcome brother, to our Bathrobe Cabal. Please familiarize yourself with the aims of the The Illustrious and Honorable Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia.

As is customary, the welcome song shall be sung:

Welcome to the jungle! We got fun n' games, We got everything you want. Honey, we know the names. We are the people that can find - Whatever you may need. If you got the money honey; We got your disease. In the jungle! Welcome to the jungle! Watch it bring you to your shunn,n,n,n,,n,n,,n,n,n,,n,n,,n knees, knees; I wanna watch you bleed!

If you have a suggestion for the advancement of the Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia; or a country you would like to see invaded, please direct your comment to the Bathrobe Cabal diabolical discussion page. Stay Frosty! Dfrg_msc 02:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- TRANSMISSION ENDS -

manky meet[edit]

Are you still up for Wikipedia:Meetup/Manchester_3? Do come, we're having kebaaaahb- or something lol :)Merkinsmum 18:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't make it, I'm afraid. One of my favourite bands are playing in Edinburgh tha night and it's been hailed as the best tour in years by the fans, so I can't really miss it. Astral (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The IRC Buddy Barnstar
For being there to talk to on IRC, when things are quiet, or feeling lonely, and for being such a great person and Wikipedian! Stwalkerstertalk ] 17:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle User Category[edit]

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smile[edit]

Please! <3 ~ Riana 22:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Riana's request for bureaucratship[edit]

Dear Astral, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana 12:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

glomp ~ Riana 12:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]