User talk:AspenSavannah

Welcome!

Hello, AspenSavannah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 15:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Lorne Greene's New Wilderness. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 01:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 21:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AspenSavannah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

aspenparkland is just one person Aspenparkland (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Rename done, unblocking as user understands the original concerns. Alex Shih (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm still very new to editing. The link to my blog post contained the information on a webpage from my, now defunct, website. I removed both versions of the link, once I learn the policy.

Should I be doing the revision of the New Wilderness page in my sandbox and post it as one major revision or as a long series of minor revisions? Aspenparkland (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Alexf. I am inclined to believe that this as a honest mistake of unintentional self promotion. The name "Aspenparkland" doesn't seem to turn up any organisations, which convinces me that it is merely a choice of username. The user seems to be well-meaning and willing to follow our policies, so I would appreciate if you could take another look at this account, thanks! Alex Shih (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Shih: As long as the user understands the issues, I have no problem. User must understand the problem with the name, and the username policy. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the response. Pinging Boing! said Zebedee‎; do you think this username should be changed? @Aspenparkland: Please propose an alternative username just in case the consensus is against your current username on English Wikipedia. Cheers, Alex Shih (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to keep Aspenparkland, but if necessary AspenSavannah will do. I was trying avoid "appears to be original research" by linking to an outside source with my research on episode list for New Wilderness. Aspenparkland (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Shih and Aspenparkland: I think a rename would be the best approach - even if the current name only represents a now defunct web site, the problem will surely arise again with people seeing it as "appearing to represent... etc". AspenSavannah sounds fine, and if you confirm you're happy with that I'll do the rename ~~and unblock~~. (Don't worry about the wikibreak message I'm about to post on my user page - I'll still be around for a few days to do this). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AspenSavannah works for me. Aspenparkland (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've done the rename, but it's probably best if I leave the reviewing admin, Alex Shih, to deal with the unblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of Wild Kingdom (1963-1984) episodes) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating List of Wild Kingdom (1963-1984) episodes, AspenSavannah!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nature (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moment of Impact (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Animal World episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tsavo National Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cryptozoology Emergency[edit]

Just thought I'd give everyone that's a member of WikiProject Cryprozoology a heads up. I've been seeing a lot of that looks like vandalism by Bloodoffox, removing cryptozoology categories and rewording things to appear as though article topics are on mythological creatures. I believe this is an attempt to get his merger proposal for List of Cryptids merged with List of mythological creatures although I cannot be sure. You might want to give your input here--Paleface Jack 02:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank youSgerbic (talk) 04:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AspenSavannah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AspenSavannah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wildlife Cinema episodes[edit]

Hi I’m new page reviewer and I’m just looking at this article you created a few months ago. It has been in the queue of unreviewed articles for a long time and I think the reason is that while you’ve sourced the detail of each individual programme broadcast, it’s not clear that the whole series itself is notable. There is a redlink to Wildlife Cinema. If you are interested in creating it, it would be helpful to have an article about the whole series, or perhaps add some introductory detail to this list article and then we can rename it. What do you think? Mccapra (talk) 12:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Wildlife Cinema episodes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Wildlife Cinema episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wildlife Cinema episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]