User talk:Ashrafnlkn

Hello, Ashrafnlkn, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 06:42, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Proposed deletion of Shaikh Basheer Ahmed Mohiuddin[edit]

The article Shaikh Basheer Ahmed Mohiuddin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 22:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Malik Deenar Uroos. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 12:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nagore Shahul Hamid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pratap Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding external links[edit]

Hi. I've undone your addition of an external link at Darul Huda Islamic University because it is simply a diffferent domain that points to the exact same web site. There is no need to list every domain that the university uses. -- Whpq (talk) 11:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samastha Kerala Islamatha Vidyabasa Board[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samastha Kerala Islamatha Vidyabasa Board requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. naveenpf (talk) 13:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sayyid Alavi Thangal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 12:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darussalam Islamic Academy[edit]

The article Darussalam Islamic Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unknown institute, lacks wiki general notablity criteria

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shrikanthv (talk) 09:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Badriya Masjid Nellikunnu Beach Road[edit]

The article Badriya Masjid Nellikunnu Beach Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mosque. Only ref is to a website that doesn't appear to talk about the mosque, but has the same name as the article creator.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malik Deenar (r) Kasaragod Andyavisramam Kollunna Swahabi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Arab Spring, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jeancey (talk) 06:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Literature review on Jasmine revolution[edit]

Hello, Ashrafnlkn. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Literature review on Jasmine revolution, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Skrelk (talk) 07:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Literature review on Jasmine revolution[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Literature review on Jasmine revolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malik Deenar (r) Kasaragod Andyavisramam Kollunna Swahabi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malik Deenar (r) Kasaragod Andyavisramam Kollunna Swahabi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Deenar (r) Kasaragod Andyavisramam Kollunna Swahabi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tajuddeen Cheraman Perumal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tajuddeen Cheraman Perumal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajuddeen Cheraman Perumal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imama Mdia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imama Mdia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imama Mdia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P.M.S.A Pookoya Thangal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P.M.S.A Pookoya Thangal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.M.S.A Pookoya Thangal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twaqa Ahmed Moulawi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twaqa Ahmed Moulawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twaqa Ahmed Moulawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C Koya Kutty Musliyar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C Koya Kutty Musliyar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C Koya Kutty Musliyar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thangal Uppapa Uroos for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thangal Uppapa Uroos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thangal Uppapa Uroos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nellikunnu Muhyaddin Juma Masjid for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nellikunnu Muhyaddin Juma Masjid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nellikunnu Muhyaddin Juma Masjid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Are you aware of Wikipedia:WikiProject Kerala? You can get help there to improve WP:RS for your article creations. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thangal Uppapa[edit]

The article Thangal Uppapa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-remarkable individual. Fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 18:15, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dr.U Baputty Haji may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Malabar

Dr.U Baputty Haji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Malabar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pangil Ahmed Kutty Musliyar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Your addition to Darul Huda Islamic University has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.darulhuda.com/recognitions.php Whpq (talk) 13:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Varakkal Mullokoya Thangal) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Varakkal Mullokoya Thangal, Ashrafnlkn!

Wikipedia editor Bilingual2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well furnished biography, try to make its malayalam version in Malayalam wikipedia too (ml)

To reply, leave a comment on Bilingual2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for August 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ali Musliyar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sayyid Sanaulla Makti Thangal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fazal Pookoya Thangal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fazal Pookoya Thangal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zainuddin Makhdoom 2[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Ashrafnlkn, thanks for creating Zainuddin Makhdoom 2!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:00, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

There is a large list of copyright violation notices for you here. STOP uploading copyright material to wikipedia, please. To avoid legal problems, wikipedia cannot allow users to do this. If you continue to upload images taken from other websites, you will end up getting yourself blocked. Please, stop now. Dolescum (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove tags without fixing the pointed out issues[edit]

Hi Ashraf, thanks for creating multiple articles about places in Kasaragod district and about famous people there. Other editors and reviewers add tags for corrections and improvements in the article. Kindly improve the article or leave the tags as such, so that someone else might correct it. Please dont blindly remove added tags. It will not help in improving the articles. Saral Simon Stalin 09:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saralstalin (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of KK Aboobacker Hazrath[edit]

Hello Ashrafnlkn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged KK Aboobacker Hazrath for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wieno (talk) 05:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 23:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220 of ^Borg 02:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 02:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr.U Baputty Haji[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr.U Baputty Haji, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PaintedCarpet (talk) 03:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. U. Bapputty Haji[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. U. Bapputty Haji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Prof TPMS (talk) 08:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 18:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

The page Cherussery Aboobacker has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the content of the page appeared to be purely promotion of something or someone, and was unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything, whether a company, product, group, service, person, religious or political belief, or anything else. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

The same applies to KK Aboobacker Hazrath. A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and must not praise its subject. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that more than once you have re-created an article which has been deleted as the result of consensus at a deletion discussion, the re-created article being either identical or virtually identical to the deleted one. Wikipedia works by collaboration and consensus, and individual editors who ignore consensus among other editors and unilaterally repeat editing which has been decided to be unsuitable are considered disruptive. Please don't continue to do this; if you do, an administrator may block you from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Ashrafnlkn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Please see WP:Identifying reliable sources. Do you have any more sources to add to the article Zainuddin Makhdoom II? Note that the blogs were removed. – Fayenatic London 14:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Darussalam Islamic Academy" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Darussalam Islamic Academy. Since you had some involvement with the Darussalam Islamic Academy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kutyava (talk) 06:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darussalam Islamic Academy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darussalam Islamic Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darussalam Islamic Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kutyava (talk) 05:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darussalam Islamic Academy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darussalam Islamic Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darussalam Islamic Academy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kutyava (talk) 00:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 14:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

Your text was promotional in tone, as was your request on my talk page, and completely unreferenced, It was posted in one edit without wikilinks or references and looks as if it is a copyright violation. It was previously deleted by a deletion discussion too. However wonderful you think he is, and article on a living person has to meet our guidelines Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have gone through the issues that you have raised on the page I published earlier. I admit that the number of references I cited are lesser. But the person on whom page has created has good reputation as academician and has won many awards for his scholarship. There are enough references (mostly the link of newspapers) that testify my argument. I want to invite your kind attention that he is not my relative and this page is not meant for publicity. It is an humble request that please restore page at earliest so that I can supplement enough references. Ashrafnlkn (talk) 04:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

on speedy deletion of the page[edit]

I am taking into cosideration what ever you have raised as the serious issues in this page and am ready to supplement enough references with credibilty that you are asking. Acutally, Dr. Nadwi is renowned and among the links that i have given, there are enough reliable informations, which are unbiased and authentic. Some of them are the link to newspaper pages which are writtern in Malayalam language. If you want, i am ready to translate those pages in other than English language. For improving the page, i kindly request you to restore the page. Ashrafnlkn (talk) 12:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kottumala Aboobacker Musliyar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kottumala Aboobacker Musliyar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kottumala Aboobacker Musliyar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 10:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zainuddin Makhdoom II for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zainuddin Makhdoom II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zainuddin Makhdoom II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mujeeb Jaihoon[edit]

Hello Ashrafnlkn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mujeeb Jaihoon for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Madam/ Sir,

I have been blocked from contributing to Wikipedia after uploading an article on Mujeeb Jaihoon. I used some of the citations, which turned to be not reliable. I haven't committed this mistake intentionally. I have learnt the seriousness of this act. Actually, Mr. Mujeeb Jaihoon is a notable person from Kerala, India and widely acknowledged for his contribution towards the mystic poetry. I can add some more citation for your kind attention (at the end of this letter). I kindly request you to lift the ban and unblock me.

https://www.khaleejtimes.com/uae/sharjah-inspires-indian-resident-to-pen-historical-fiction https://gulfnews.com/lifestyle/we-like-mujeeb-jaihoons-twitter-achievement-1.811153 https://mbrf.ae/en/read/the-path-to-sustainable-development/12 https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/tribute-to-shihab-thangal-wins-many-hearts-in-gulf/article25218061.ece https://www.muslimmirror.com/eng/italian-translation-of-slogans-of-the-sage-launched-in-dubai/ https://24.kg/english/238877_How_meeting_with_the_Kyrgyz_in_China_brought_writer_Mujeeb_Jaihoon_to_Bishkek/ https://thecompanion.in/book-review-a-modern-pursuit-of-the-mappila-identity/

Ashrafnlkn (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashrafnlkn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

request for unblocking Ashrafnlkn (talk) 08:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; empty unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashrafnlkn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to you with a sincere and humble appeal to request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, which was blocked due to a recent mistake I made while uploading an article. First and foremost, I deeply regret the error I made, and I take full responsibility for my actions. The article I attempted to upload was about a highly regarded individual who holds significance among Muslims in Kerala, India. I provided several reputable sources in support of this person's notability, as mentioned in my previous correspondence. Regrettably, I was unaware at the time that some of the citations I used turned out to be unreliable, and I genuinely apologize for this oversight. I wish to emphasize that I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for a considerable period. I have contributed numerous articles and have made edits to existing ones, always striving to uphold the highest standards of accuracy and reliability. The mistake I made in my recent upload does not reflect my usual commitment to maintaining the integrity of the platform. I assure you that I have learned from this experience and will exercise utmost caution in the future to ensure that such errors do not recur. It is my ardent desire to resume my contributions to Wikipedia, as I strongly believe in the importance of sharing knowledge and promoting accurate information. I am genuinely committed to making valuable and constructive contributions to the community. I recognize that the trust of the Wikipedia community is crucial, and I am fully aware of the responsibility that comes with it. I kindly request your understanding and reconsideration in unblocking my account. I assure you that I have taken the time to reflect upon the reasons for my block and understand the impact it had on the Wikipedia community. I am fully committed to making amends and positively contributing to Wikipedia by ensuring that the information I provide is accurate, well-researched, and reliable. I am grateful for your time and consideration in reviewing my appeal. I genuinely hope that you can recognize my remorse and my sincere intention to rectify my mistake. I am ready and eager to re-engage with the Wikipedia community, applying the lessons I have learned and striving to make meaningful contributions. Once again, I express my deepest regrets for the error I made and any inconvenience it may have caused. I sincerely hope for an opportunity to prove my dedication to the principles and values of Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention, and I eagerly await your favorable response. Yours sincerely, Ashrafnlkn Some of the links about the person i uploaded last time (and got blocked): https://www.khaleejtimes.com/uae/sharjah-inspires-indian-resident-to-pen-historical-fiction https://gulfnews.com/lifestyle/we-like-mujeeb-jaihoons-twitter-achievement-1.811153 https://mbrf.ae/en/read/the-path-to-sustainable-development/12 https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/tribute-to-shihab-thangal-wins-many-hearts-in-gulf/article25218061.ece https://www.muslimmirror.com/eng/italian-translation-of-slogans-of-the-sage-launched-in-dubai/ https://24.kg/english/238877_How_meeting_with_the_Kyrgyz_in_China_brought_writer_Mujeeb_Jaihoon_to_Bishkek/ https://thecompanion.in/book-review-a-modern-pursuit-of-the-mappila-identity/ Ashrafnlkn (talk) 08:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request was almost entirely generated by ChatGPT. This strongly indicates you lack sufficient competence to edit here; see WP:CIR. Yamla (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Madam/ Sir, i have used ChatGpt for making the letter more convincing as it got rejected earlier. I have contributed all article without using any AI tools, and even before chatGpt got unveiled. I kindly request you to review the block and be kindful to unblock me. Ashrafnlkn (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have received your email, which as far as I could tell is the same bot-generated text as you have put here. I will not discuss this matter by email; please discuss it here and do not send me any more email regarding it. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashrafnlkn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your quick reply. I have learnt from earlier mistake. I have citated with some unreliable citations. I will not repeat that mistake. I have added article about a notable person in Kerala, India, but unfortunately some of the citations became unreliable. I can give more citation for that article from reliable sources. I have learnt from my mistake and i promise that this kind of mistakes will not be repeated from my side. I kindly request you to lift the block from me. Ashrafnlkn (talk) 04:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you enclose your unblock request in "nowiki" tags, it will not be added to the list of requests needing review. I fixed it so that it will. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir for your quick and swift reply. It shows my block is for infinite period (no expiry set). I kindly request you to help me to unblock. Please let me know what i have to do further. Ashrafnlkn (talk)

I am not convinced that you should be unblocked, so I'm not going to do that. But since your unblock request is now corrected, another administrator will review it, and if they decide you should be unblocked I have no objection to that. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You sir. I am looking forward for a positive review. Ashrafnlkn (talk) 07:58, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashrafnlkn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Madam/ Sir, I have been blocked from Wikipedia for more than one year. I have been blocked for uploading an article on one of the famous mystic writer from Kerala, Mujeeb Jaihoon. Some of the citations that i used (unintentionally) for that article were not reliable and some of found that i am using it for personal usage or spamming. I have learnt from my mistake and i promise that i will not repeat the same. I kindly request you to unblock me as i confessed my mistake and promised not repeat the same. I have contributed many articles and wish to continue the same in future. I kindly request to lift the ban. Please,Ashrafnlkn (talk) . Ashrafnlkn (talk) 11:55 pm, 4 June 2023, last Sunday (4 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Duplicate request, will review below. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #74477[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I kindly request you to revise the decision. I have gone through his contributions list, it is really rich. I believe he deserves one more chance TheTruthcontribute (talk) 10:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They will not be unblocked via UTRS when they have access to their talk page. They have an open request here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks@TheTruthcontribute

Dear @Deepfriedokra, I have been blocked since last two years for uploading one article about a mystic poet from Kerala, Mujeeb Jaihoon. The mistake I have done is to cite some unreliable sources. Actually it was done unintentionally. I confess my mistake. I have learnt from my blocking and promise to not repeat the same in future. I kindly request to lift the block. I believe that I can contribute more to Wikipedia in the form new article, editing and intervention. I kindly request once more to lift the ban. Ashrafnlkn (talk) 16:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashrafnlkn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Madam/ Sir, I have been blocked by @Seraphimblade since last two years. I have uploaded an article on a mystic poet from Kerala, Mujeeb Jaihoon and some of the citations were not reliable. I confess my mistake and have learnt its seriosness. I promise not repeat the same in future. I kindly request to unblock. If i get unblocked, I blieve i can contribute more to this free encyclopedia platform as uploading article, editing and academic intervention. I kindly request to lift the ban. Kindly Ashrafnlkn (talk) 16:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the self-promotion concerns, nor the usage of ChatGPT in prior responses. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request : a detailed one[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashrafnlkn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dears, I have been blocked by @Seraphimblade after I uploaded an article about a mystic poet from Kerala,India. He cited self-promotion and advertising as reason for blocking. Actually Mr Mujeeb Jaihoon (on whome i uploaded article , is a renowned as mystic poet, writer and social activist.He recieved many awards for his literary contributions. The mistake i have committed while uploading article was to cite some reliable sources (i can give reliable sources). I confess my mistake and have learnt from it. After two years, when i requested for unblocking, i used chatgpt for composing request. I couldn't find anything wrong with using chatgpt in composing an email or request.It is unethical to use AI tools while writing academic article.I kindly request to not decline this application. Please kindly accept this and unblock me Ashrafnlkn (talk) 23:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We will not consider unblock requests from sockpuppets. This will count against any future unblock request from you. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.