User talk:Arvin singh

Thank you for contributing the article on Silicon Optix. The article has been deleted, because you copied it word-for-word from an external website. If you can say something original about the company, feel free to re-create the article - but please don't make it seem like spam. DS 13:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Silicon Optix.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Silicon Optix.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not...[edit]

...an advertising or link-farm site. Please do not post the same link to multiple articles. -- The Anome 13:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notability[edit]

[Re: Silicon Optix]. What do you mean by non-notable? Arvin singh via e-mail

Which of the criteria laid down in WP:CORP does the company meet? Give references. -- RHaworth 10:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself"

This is the criteria that Silicon Optix has passed. Please check the following links. http://www.hoovers.com/silicon-optix/--ID__107363--/free-co-factsheet.xhtml?cm_ven=PAID&cm_cat=INK&cm_pla=CO1&cm_ite=silicon-optix http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2006/05/01/daily6.html http://www.infocomm.org/newsnetwork/index.cfm?objectID=2D3C5BB2-442D-4F82-BD2CD2AB449940A5 http://www.consumerelectronicsnet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=30977

We were also featured in Time Magazine along with various technology Magazines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvin singh (talk • contribs)

Silicon...[edit]

Hi, I'm working a bit to expand the article so it is more clear that it passes notability guidlines in WP:CORP. Wanna add me to the payroll? :) Just kidding! ---J.S (t|c) 17:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I really appreciate your help with the guidelines. Arvin Singh 17:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Arvin singh[edit]

A tag has been placed on Arvin singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C) 00:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Silicon Optix.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Silicon Optix.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]