User talk:Arty Zifferelli

Welcome!

Hi Arty Zifferelli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 10:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Kellen Winslow II, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:OVERLINK, basic nationalities like "American" are generally not linked. —Bagumba (talk) 11:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BarrelProof. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mark Hofmann have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Abbie Hoffman, Domenico Dolce, Kellen Winslow II and Mark Hofmann, please do not use an edit summary that says "Fixed typo" if the change you are making is not the correction of a typo. Please provide proper, meaningful, and truthful edit summaries. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Kellen Winslow II and Faces of Meth, please note that on Wikipedia we do not remove links just because they are dead. Instead we look for archived copies. If you don't know how to do that, or don't have the time, you can tag the link with "{{dead link}}", which will let people know that the link is dead and will encourage someone else to come and fix it. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first of your edits of Roger Mudd was not helpful. Not all names need to be linked, and again the edit summaries of both of your edits of Roger Mudd were misleading. "Fixed typo" is not an accurate description of what you did. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Envysan (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed typo[edit]

You keep using this summary when it is not accurate. Misleading summaries are not acceptable. It is better to put nothing than to intentionally mislead with a summary. Intentionally misleading others with your edit summary is arguably a form of disruptive editing. Please don't do it again, else you risk being sanctioned. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits of Meat Loaf and Ghost Ship warehouse fire again used "Fixed typo" for changes that were clearly not the correction of typos. Please don't do that. — BarrelProof (talk) 02:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again at Joan Crawford you used the same misleading edit summary "Fixed typo". In another edit of Joan Crawford you said "Fixed grammar", but your change was not a grammar correction. Please use accurate edit summaries. — BarrelProof (talk) 01:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are not seeing any of these messages, but your latest three edits show the same pattern of inappropriate behaviour – continuing to say "Fixed typo" for edits that do not fix typos, and changing section headings to "Trivia" inappropriately, for Centralia, Pennsylvania, Kenny Rogers, and Lon Chaney. — BarrelProof (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And Edward Norton. — BarrelProof (talk) 02:30, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — BarrelProof (talk) 02:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arty Zifferelli, if you continue your disruptive editing then you will be blocked from editing. Consider this a final warning. Fences&Windows 13:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All edits being marked as minor[edit]

It is not appropriate to mark all of your edits as minor. I suggest not to mark any of your edits as minor. That would be better. — BarrelProof (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption[edit]

OK, now you're just being disruptive. You've been warned sufficiently; every one of your edits is falsely labeled. That's quite enough.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]