User talk:ArthurBarrett

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as CVSNT, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material.

This article appears to be a direct copy from this site. As a copyright violation, CVSNT appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. CVSNT has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:CVSNT. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at CVSNT, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words.

Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 03:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

welcome and comments

Welcome!

Hello ArthurBarrett, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 04:48, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

CVSNT

If you would like, I suggest you use the following subpages to prepare the articles you wish to write:

User:ArthurBarrett/CVSNT and User:ArthurBarrett/CVS Suite for the other. CVS Suite has not been deleted, it is only being considered for deletion as per our deletion policy. However, you may copy the text of the article to the subpage I just suggested and work on it there.

Second, please sign comments on Talk pages by using four tildes, as so: ~~~~.

Lastly, please be aware that we frequently have contributions that appear to be advertisements, and that articles which appear to heavily favor a certain type of software will not be looked upon favorably. You should seek to achieve a neutral tone and to verify the information that you provide from multiple sources. It would also help greatly if you coud demonstrate the the topic of the article is notable in some way, rather than simply trying to promote an obscure software. Best regards, Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 04:48, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

CVS / CVSNT etc etc

I'd like some help editing the entry for "Concurrent Versions System".

I'm writing to HELPME because I frankly dont know who else can explain a few things to me, so I appreciate any time you can spend sorting me out.

I e-mailed evilpheonix who I had previously corresponded with, and they got back to me briefly saying they'd look into it next time they are online - but I haven't heard anything since.

The "Concurrent Versions System" open source software is quite old, and there are many open source projects that could be considered "deriratives" or projects in their own right. I work for a company who sponsor one of these "CVSNT", and updating the Wiki pages to include either a little info about CVSNT on the CVS page or create a new page seems tricky.

I had one go - I added info to the "Limitations" section because there was already reference in there to how SVN has resolved some CVS problems. But that was removed as an advert, but subsequently WAN Disco have done the same thing. Now maybe someone will remove the WAN Disco stuff, but what about the SVN stuff? When is something an advert and when isn't it? I don't really want to go in and remove someone elses stuff just because someone removed mine...

Rather than make changes to the CVS page I've put comments in the Discuss page, but it doesn't appear that anyone reads it to comment on one way or anther. I've also created a draft CVSNT page as ArthurBarrett/CVSNT, and listed changes that I propose making to the CVS entry in the discuss page for ArthurBarrett/CVSNT.

Am I going about this the right way?

Thanks for your time and any help you can offer.

Thanks,

Arthur 04:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I think you are going about it the right way, but let's take this one step at a time. Does User:ArthurBarrett/CVSNT present different information than Concurrent Versions System? If so, move your new article to CVSNT - I can help you with that if you like.--Commander Keane 04:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with this. Yes my CVSNT page User:ArthurBarrett/CVSNT talks only about CVSNT - not "CVS" and not specifically "concurrent versioning systems" so it present different information than Concurrent Versions System?. It's a little bare at the moment but has the basics for me (and hopefully others) to build on.

I had previously created the entry in the "public area" but moved it at evilpheonix's suggestion. I just tried to move it back but I get this message:

The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid. Please choose another name, or use Requested moves to ask an administrator to help you with the move.

The existing "CVSNT" page is simply a redirect:

#redirect [[Concurrent Versions System]]

Can you help with that?

Also is your e-mail link the best way to have this discussion or should I be putting this in my talk page?

Thanks Arthur 06:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

OK, I've done the move (an admin - me in this case - needed to delete the redirect before the move occurred). CVSNT now has all the info in it. The best way to discuss with me is on your talk page. Wikipedians generally only use the email to deal with blocks (since blocked users can't use talk pages) and sensitive information. I check my email twice a day, whereas I have your talk page on my watchlist - which I check upto 50 times a day. So this talk page is the best place for this conversation to take place.--Commander Keane 06:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Great - looks good! What's next? My suggested changes for the Concurrent Versions System page are listed in Talk:CVSNT and there is also a little discussion in Talk:Concurrent Versions System. I dont want to spam up the good Concurrent Versions System article however there are already similar references to other tools where appropriate in the article. Id prefer if someone other than me was responsible for deciding to continue the bloat or doing the pruning. I'm off home now so I'll check up tomorrow - thanks for all your help!

Not wanting to be pushy - but have you had any thoughts on the next step? My suggested changes for the Concurrent Versions System page are listed in Talk:CVSNT and there is also a little discussion in Talk:Concurrent Versions System. I dont want to spam up the good Concurrent Versions System article however there are already similar references to other tools where appropriate in the article. Id prefer if someone other than me was responsible for deciding to continue the bloat or doing the pruning. Arthur 03:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Since I don't know anything about CVS, making content descisions for the encyclopedia is difficult for me. The mention of CVSNT in Concurrent Versions System seems fine to me as it is, but if you have some good ideas for changes go ahead and make them.--Commander Keane 05:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

hello 166.205.153.27 (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:ArthurBarrett/CVS Suite

A tag has been placed on User:ArthurBarrett/CVS Suite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 03:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Why am I being asked to justify keeping a draft article?

Arthur (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Malicious citations

A discussion of citing sources (Malicious requests for citations) may be in order, generally (without specifics from an article), OR, a request for third party comment. Having the article discussion on a policy page seemed out of place IMO. Student7 (talk) 15:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

I thought I was starting a general discussion - the example provided was a, err, um, EXAMPLE. If you thought the example was poor then stating the reasons why, or adding a better example would have been a more helpful action rather than simply deleting the discussion. Arthur (talk) 09:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CVSNT

A tag has been placed on CVSNT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Someone else (not me) has already removed this malicious speedy deletion flag. Arthur (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Concurrent Versions System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solaris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)