User talk:Arnon Chaffin/Archive2

Caerleon F.C. / Caerleon A.F.C.

Why have you reverted my edit to Caerleon FC ? Caerleon A.F.C. is the correct name of this Club which i am associated with. We now have two pages with identical content !

Caerleon F.C.

Evidence of Caerleon A.F.C. as requested: Check out this seasons Welsh cup results at: http://www.caldicottownafc.co.uk/Cups.htm Hence I have reinstated my redirect on the Caerleon F.C. page. Also, would be polite/helpful to include in your comments why you are reverting edits.

James D. Nicoll

Did you mean to revert me? If so, why? I closed the debate as a snowball keep; we have probably the world's foremost expert on F&SF advocating keep and categorically asserting notability in several areas, after all. Guy (Help!)

Hey

Are you on the welcoming committee??? Karibear 21:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

yaaaaaaaaay

thanks its working

Thanks

ROOSTER RULEZ says thanks for the offer I do know a bit about wikipedia but if I need help i will ask you

Of course

I don't care, you could steal the whole userpage! --Endo(Exo) 19:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

If I need help, you're the person i'll trust!! Politics rule 19:25, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply

1. Create your own text, 2, create really unique colors, 3, taco. --Endo(Exo) 22:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC),

• Much better, but for your beautiful message, a suggestion is lighter colours. That comment above was not posted by me. --Endo(Exo) 23:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I like them very much! :)

I like your templates very much, Arnie! :) Good work! If you want, I can design a unique format for you, with an image and colors... would you like that? Just let me know if you do, and I'll happily fly over here! :) Have a beautiful weekend! Phaedriel - 03:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the Birthday Committee

Welcome, Arnon Chaffin/Archive2, to the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! You have met all of the membership requirements. Any concerns should be directed to Steveo2. See the Birthday Committee Project Page to see our userbox and the Birthday Message Templates. Go to the bulletin board to see any new announcements concerning the committee. Remember, Be Bold!

Politics rule 01:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Inserting an image "for dummies"

I am new to this, trying to insert an image on an encyclopedia page, not sure where to upload it to?

When I press "insert image" it pulls up the code that I update to my info:

• John Hobson
  John Hobson

Where do I upload an image to get it to be referenced by this tag?

What goes in the fields to upload below?

Destination filename:

Summary (author, source, URL, fair use rationale if applicable, extra {{tags}}, etc.):

I just don't get where the image folder is and how to reference??

Thanks for any help

RE: Birthday wishes

Thank you for the kind birthday wishes. Have a wonderful day! --Valley2city^₪‽ 21:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes

Thanks for that link. Unfortuantly, I have ti go to work, and that will have to wait. Anyway thanks. I'm going to have a field day! Politics rule 12:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Arnie!

Hey, Arnie! Thanks for keeping an eye on the Ebilshroom matter at my talk page earlier, and for helping to find a solution to it! :) I keep growing more and more impressed at your great work and fast learning. You have a great future here, and I'm so proud and happy I could offer you my modest advice with your first steps. I'm making a test template for you now - with a little luck, you'll have it ready and working just tomorrow :) Love, Phaedriel - 03:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the adminship anniversary messages. You posted two of them, hehe. :) -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 17:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thnx for reminding me that I am not using edit summary. I am new and will keep in mind these things. Regards.........

wow

that was quick, nice job

sorry for any trouble, just a joke in my tmp class :)

Help

Can you help me by telling me how to copyright my image [[Image:Bothferry.jpg]] I dont know how to do it.

WikiProject Cricket Quiz

Why did you revert my edit? --Jpeeling 19:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I didnt clear the page or vandalise it, I'd archived the old questions if you looked carefully. --Jpeeling 19:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the warning on my talk page. I hope with that, I can convince User:Lemonsour, User:NeonWolf and User:DarkPoetLostSoul not to talk so much! :D Jack 23:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

On my talk page, that is. :D Jack 23:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Update

Hey, thanks for the revert and updating the vandal counter. :-) — Indon (reply) — 13:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

My problem

Thanks for giving me advice against this problem. You sure do know waht to do!

=)

Politics rule 20:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks. I will read that!

Politics rule 20:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

My Rfa

Hello, Arnon. Thank you very much for your kind support in my recent Rfa, it succeeded! I hope to live up to your expectations. If you ever need a hand, please let me know. Oh, and I wish you a great Wikibreak, too. See you! PeaceNT 04:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Please unblock Dom58

Hi dom58! is my friend and I'm not a sock puppet of him! Our histary on wiki dates back a long time when we where the 'Free Toast Vandles' Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dom56! But we have reformed pur selfs we now help with spam pages and make good articals so please un block my friend Thank You Goodwikipidian 08:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

WHAT?

You put a notice on my page saying I was encouraging someone to create sockpuppets! What do you mean!? Jack 23:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, just a little clarification

Quoted from WP:SOCK..."Some people feel that second accounts should not be used at all; others feel it is harmless if the accounts are behaving acceptably." So, technically, second accounts ARE allowed, but are usually discouraged. Just some clarification. Jack 23:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

password

done and done ^_^ Ebilshroom 13:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Smile

James, La gloria è a dio has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

How have you liked wikipedia so far? Peace:)--James, La gloria è a dio 16:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. I do to. I've been fighting vandalism since December. WOuld you like me to suggest some tools? Peace:)--James, La gloria è a dio 16:37, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay. Feel free to ask if you change your mind. --James, La gloria è a dio 16:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm a little confused with your editing the edits I have made to our page (Call_of_Combat). You want me to go into a detailed rebuttal of the points raised? Cause I got a little bored going through that and decided it was far easier to just delete the whole lot.

You want me to remove one line at a time so as not to alert you that by removing large amounts of text I am changing the overall tone/truth of the article? You want me to slowly change the overall meaning of the article because of the above? Or can I remove rubbish because it is rubbish?

RFA

Thanks so much for supporting me in the RFA. I am grateful for your response, and it really means a lot to be appreciated. Thanks again! hmwithtalk 04:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

sockpuppet answer

Hello, I don't know if Phaedriel's online, but I'm here, and I think WP:DUCK applies for the probable sockpuppet nature of these accounts. I, like probably hundreds of people, have her page on my watchlist. She is a very popular person, for reasons you already know. Thanks for your vigilance! --Kyoko 13:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

This same person seems to have some sort of grudge against User:Acalamari, because for months, this vandal has been alleging romances between Acalamari and various female admins, and if I remember correctly, the vandal made numerous inappropriately named accounts ("Acalamari loves etc."). Yes, it is trolling, but I think the duck test applies too. I can't think of any other persistent vandal who works quite this way. --Kyoko 13:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

You would probably have to go through the edit history of Acalamari's page, as well as the pages of all his other targets, to find an answer. I don't feel like doing that right now, to be honest.--Kyoko 13:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Socks

Hello Arnon Chaffin: the recruit an IP club is just an imaginary club that Ryan Postlethwaite and I made up since we are both users who have managed to convince an IP address to register an account. :) All you have to do is convince an IP to register, and bingo! You're a member of the club! :)

As for the sockpuppeteer, I believe that the puppetmaster is a user called "Owner of boats". After my RfA from two months ago ended unsuccessfully, a group of users said about how sorry they were for my nomination not being a success. As I was responding to them all, I edit conflicted on my own talk page with a user called "Owner of boats". They were the first to talk about my love for certain female admininistrators (at that stage, Natalie Erin). I am certain Owner of boats is the puppetmaster, as they started this. In fact, they've just started their trolling again a few days ago. Acalamari 17:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't want to discuss the troll for much longer, as it will only provoke him; however, I will answer your questions. No, I have not had any trolling before all this happened: all I had was vandalism. As for the RfA, I don't understand your question: the only people who came to my talk page after it ended was the bureaucrat and administrators, as seen here. As for looking into this, the only way we'd find out is to do a checkuser on all the names, but since this is a case of obvious sockpuppetry, I don't believe a checkuser would be allowed. Owner of boats began the trolling, and it's continued since then. If you want, you could go through the history of mine and Natalie Erin's user/talk pages and list all the users who have done the "WikiLove" trolling, but that could take an hour or two or more to do. Anyway, the user will just get reverted-and-blocked on site. It's annoying what this person does, but there are plenty of people watching my pages, so the troll's accounts won't last very long. I appreciate your input, but in the interests of WP:DENY, I think it's best that we try not to talk about the troll. Acalamari 18:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:Thanks

Don't mention it, dear Arnon. You're doing great, so keep up the good work, and rock on! :) PeaceNT 18:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for welcome

Hi Arnon! Although I've been around for about two years, I really appreciate your welcome ^^. I don't know how many times I have visited an editor's user page, saw an official welcome, and wondered why I didn't ever get such a thing. Now I have it! Have a great day! Mumun 無文 20:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcoming Error

You welcomed an editor on his User Page, but anyway, you're doing great work. Flubeca (t) 22:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm...

I think this is actually along the lines of what's posted above...but...I moved one of your welcomes :D. It was on the user page, so I moved it to the user's talk. Jack^Talk 22:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

User talk:68.250.134.196)

That anon user's edit to Islam and Judaism looked to be an honest (if massive) mistake. Wouldn't a level one warning that assumes good faith be a more appropriate warning? Derumi 23:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Smile

GreaterWikiholic has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A correct change fasely considered vandalism.

Hi. I made a correction on the Wikipedia article for Lucario. I noticed it said the pokemon was a Water and some other type or so in the "In the Video Games" section, and this has been proven incorrect for awhile now. I changed it to the proper types, Steel and Fighting. If you need proof of this information it can be found on http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/448.shtml. I noticed the false sentence I erased was not restored. The sentence I added was not making the article nonfactual in any way, and wether you had it kept or not, I don't find it as something worthy of being called. I'd also like to say that in the future, please make sure if you think a change has been nonfactual and was only vandalism. Research in the subject in other sources. If none of this is enough, I also own Pokemon Diamond, have a Lucario in that game, and it is listed in the game as a Steel and Fighting type. Please respond on the talk page of my account (I just didn't log into it when I edited the article) "Drillkid31" if you wish to speak to me more about this matter. I simply don't like being charged with vandalism when I was only trying to help get rid of false information. Thank you for your time.

For those of you who don't get the above, I edited with proven information, and although it is still on the page, I got slapped with a vandalism warning after editing it while not on my account. I simply don't like getting falsly slapped with vandalism warnings.

Drillkid31 01:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Err...

Why did you post something on my talk? Something about vandalism? I know it says "test", but why put it on my talk? :D Jack^Talk 03:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry...

This used was the one they gave me when I saw the vadalism charge... that and I'll admit I don't know much about contacting other wiki members. This is just what I found. I'm sorry if this should've been said somewhere else, please forgive me.

Drillkid31 13:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

สวัสดี hello

เราเป็นคนไทยนะ เลยมาสวัสดีหน่อย อ่านภาษาไทยออกไหม ตอนนี้ประเทศไทยกำลังมีการตัดสินคดียุบพรรค ไทยรักไทยและประชาธิปัต มาสวัสดีเฉยๆแหละ บาย 203.170.226.253 13:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

---

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Jean Plaidy Internal rhyme Alex Rodriguez WCWM Spanish Renaissance High Sheriff of Cornwall Egg magazine Cool (aesthetic) Great white shark Paul Goddard Roz Weston Larry Hughes Font family (HTML) Microorganism Malcolm Allison World-Point Academy of Tourism Ron Meyer Tax farming ITT Technical Institute

Cleanup Glyphosate Panic! at the Disco Closed list Merge Pants Hercules Rock music Add Sources AOL Oak Hill Academy (Virginia) Scurvy Wikify Pick and roll Chia-Wei Woo Chris Heaton-Harris Expand English Renaissance Clea DuVall Neolithic architecture

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 14:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: My own Template

As your template is worded, it assumes bad faith (level 3+), whether or not you do when you use it. It calls the user's action "vandalism" and urges the user to stop vandalizing. That is assumption of bad faith. Typical level one warnings merely state the edit was unconstructive and assumes good faith, level two warnings assume neither good nor bad faith, and states that the edit "appears" to be vandalism. It isn't until the later two warning levels that vandalism is assumed. As for examples of this, I've already posted the examples in my previous talk comment (Regarding your "vampire smiley" warn template), regarding the template in this particular form. Your fight against vandalism is commendable, but there is a need to have reasonable warnings given out to those who make unconstructive edits. Not everyone making an unconstructive edit is doing it out of bad will, hence the usual need to start off with a level one warning that assumes good faith. If the user continues with bad edits after a low level warning (levels 1-2) is given out, that is when the higher level warnings (and then the block requests) can be pursued. Derumi 16:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings

Hello, could you please SUBST {{User:Arnon Chaffin/Vandalism Warning}} in future, to prevent server strain? Thanks, Will ^{(We're flying the flag all over the world)} 22:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Huh!?

Why did you post "This is a level 2 warning, please follow with a level 3 warning." on my talk? I haven't done any vandalism (check my contributions)! :O! It DOES say it's a test...but...Why put that!? Jack^Talk 00:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikilove

Thx ... I'll pass it on! Victuallers 10:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)