User talk:Arjunfilmantena

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Arjunfilmantena, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jiyen Krishnakumar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jiyen Krishnakumar[edit]

The article Jiyen Krishnakumar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ravi Singh (Actor)[edit]

The article Ravi Singh (Actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 08:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beef Janata Party[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Beef Janata Party, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MTKASH^{TALK Contribs} 12:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bharatiya Janata Party, you may be blocked from editing. Vanamonde (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rathish Ambat[edit]

The article Rathish Ambat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References as single line mentions and listings. WP:TOOSOON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Rathish Ambat. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 17:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused why you did delete it in any case, given that I was contesting the speedy deletion of a page you are making plenty of edits on Nosebagbear (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an independent film production company where more than 30 yound talented people working. Kindly hold on the deletion process. There are more than 100 articles published by reputed media's mentioned the company's name in their article along with the movie news!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Corridor 6 Films, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gokulam Gopalan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning 13:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Corridor 6 Films. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corridor 6 Films[edit]

Corridor 6 Films is a Mumbai Based Motion Picture , Production and distribution company.kindly note it.and remove the deletion template . Arjunfilmantena (talk) 04:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ajay Devaloka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Director and World Premiere

Who (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cinema

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Corridor 6 Films. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corridor 6 Films[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Corridor 6 Films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Arjunfilmantena. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corridor 6 Films[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Corridor 6 Films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating the same article. It is disruptive editing and could lead to a block. Also, you're editing a lot relating to the Who fim; do you have any COI in relation to that? Also, you must not remove speedy deletion tags as you did here Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Your addition to Talk:Corridor_6_Films has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corridor 6 Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corridor 6 Films[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Corridor 6 Films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue doing this you will likely get blocked; repeatedly recreating the article will not make it more notable. I'd strongly suggest stopping because you are just frankly wasting your time (and ours). Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:42, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 19:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

L

Reminder 3[edit]

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Paid Editor[edit]

Vijay Moolan is an Indian Film Producer. Arjunfilmantena (talk) 13:37, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where you get this image from? GSS (talk|c|em) 13:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arjunfilmantena: Why are you so interested in Vijay Moolan, a guy who's produced one film? Also, how many accounts have you opened at Wikipedia? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Possible UDP/COI. Thank you. — GSS (talk|c|em) 14:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vijay Moolan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Moolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Moolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

A sockpuppet investigation (WP:SPI) concerning your account is underway at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arjunfilmantena.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because Vijay Moolan Deserves Wiki..[edit]

He is a celebrity. Please do approve and make live this wiki article .Arjunfilmantena (talk) 15:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody "deserves" anything. We have notability requirements. And the glaring lack of coverage in major news sources casts strong doubts on your claim that he is a "celebrity". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Vijay Moolan. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Me.vaishakh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Arjunfilmantena. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Arjunfilmantena. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ravi Singh (actor)[edit]

Hello, Arjunfilmantena. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ravi Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 02:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jiyen Krishnakumar[edit]

Hello, Arjunfilmantena. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jiyen Krishnakumar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 02:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]