User talk:AnotherTimeline

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome AnotherTimeline!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 42,208,678 registered editors!
Hello AnotherTimeline. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
  Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, -Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 18:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

-Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 18:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Antonovich Devier has been accepted[edit]

Peter Antonovich Devier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 22:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patriki Film Festival moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Patriki Film Festival, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noting this. It seems that Deadline, Variety and Calvert Journal referenced in the article are reputable and independent media outlets showing a certain amount of adherence to notability guidelines. (Variety (magazine), Deadline Hollywood, Calvert 22 Foundation.
Would you reconsider please? I'm submitting the draft for review. AnotherTimeline (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alexey Bokov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have rewritten and drastically shortened the article, leaving out irrelevant and unverifiable information. I tried to rewrite the article about a notable media person in neutral style providing citations from independent media sources. AnotherTimeline (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Alexey Bokov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 11:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution. I've already contested the speedy deletion of the article, and I would greatly appreciate if you specify any particular way one can improve the article as I don't really understand the vague point for deletion nomination here. AnotherTimeline (talk) 🇺🇦 13:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alexey Bokov moved to draftspace[edit]

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Alexey Bokov, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. signed, Rosguill talk 19:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patriki Film Festival (July 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onmyway22 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onmyway22 talk 02:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thank you, Onmyway22. I'll try to rework the article. AnotherTimeline (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AnotherTimeline! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onmyway22 talk 02:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, AnotherTimeline. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patriki Film Festival, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alexey Bokov[edit]

Hello, AnotherTimeline. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexey Bokov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 21:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Patriki Film Festival[edit]

Hello, AnotherTimeline. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patriki Film Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Isthmus55. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Björk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Isthmus55 (talk) 22:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They were constructive, you just don't like crucial details about your darling being published. AnotherTimeline (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have reliable sources (as seen here) that state that the map she posted was false? If so, you'd likely need to reword it as simply stating 'fake map' violates our rules on neutral point of view. Anyhow, the map itself seems highly contentious, and I can't seem to find any greenlisted sources that support your claim. Feel free to object, but seeing as someone put highly biased wording into a controversial part of her article, I was just doing my job. Thanks. Isthmus55 (talk) 12:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another note is that some greenlisted publications (such as Al Jazeera and Haaretz) are still generally considered unreliable for reporting on the conflict. Isthmus55 (talk) 13:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]