User talk:Anonimski/Archives/2015/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swedish krona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Solar storm of 2012
 | On 24 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Solar storm of 2012, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that if the solar storm of 2012 (pictured) had hit Earth, it might have taken several years to recover from the resulting widespread destruction of electronic equipment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Solar storm of 2012. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 13:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Bullying
Well everything I bother to edit gets reverted by you. If you carry on with that I will get the admins invovled. Okay one revert, fair enough, but everything, and so far you haven't been responding to my talk page comments. This is not acceptable behaviour. --Let's keep it neutral (talk) 13:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not doing anything do bully you, the problem is that your edits have added inaccuracy (the "no Cyrillic for Serbian" in Kosovo articles, the statement that only one group says "North Kosovska Mitrovica", etc.), failed to provide verification while going against what two other notable sources say (link), and you've also refused to let there be a wikilink to Serbian-American when an author from the group was mentioned in another article. This is a very strange way of editing articles and it hasn't improved quality... - Anonimski (talk) 13:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)