User talk:Andreareimer

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Andrea Reimer. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Andrea Reimer, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Andrea Reimer appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Andrea Reimer has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://twitter.com/andreareimer (matching the regex rule \btwitter\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Andrea Reimer do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://andreareimer.typepad.com (matching the regex rule \btypepad\.com\b).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:33, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Andrea Reimer. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Additionally, it appears that based upon your user name you may have a conflict of interest with this article. I would encourage you to review the conflict of interest guidelines listed at the top of this page. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Andrea Reimer, you will be blocked from editing. It is not appropriate for you to remove such large portions of an article that are well cited, particularly since it appears from your user name that you have a conflict of interest regarding this article. Please review the conflict of interest guidelines here: conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Reimer article[edit]

It appears from your edits that you feel there are some inaccuracies in the Andrea Reimer article. It would be helpful if you would discuss what you feel is inaccurate on the article's talk page here, instead of just deleting large portions of the article that are well-cited without explanation as to the specific issue you are taking issue with. This step is particularly important since it appears from your user name that you have a potential conflict of interest. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:53, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Andrea Reimer, you will be blocked from editing. Once again, please do not remove cited references in an article that you appear to have a conflict of interest for. It would be most helpful if you discuss on the article talk page what particular issues you have with the claims that are well documented and provide alternative sources that contradict the well cited sources. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]