User talk:Amaramoore

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Amaramoore, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Amaramoore, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Amaramoore/sandbox[edit]

I would like to inform you that on Wikipedia, articles require reliable sources. If you wish to publish it as an article, you will need to add reliable, independent, secondary sources to verify the information in the article and establish notability. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me by replying to this message. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you so much for the information. I will gladly have you to read over my corrections to make sure it correct for Wikipedia. Amaramoore (talk) 02:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Better, but there is still a lot of information with no citation. If you want, you can use their TikTok and Instagram posts as primary sources for some of it. Also, if you could find a couple more sources like the three you already added, that would be quite helpful. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will go and add those posts as primary sources. I can also find more resources on faceless influencers, but the other articles about the subject were not usable. Amaramoore (talk) 16:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why were they not usable? QuicoleJR (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone reviewed them and said they cannot be used. There were no credited authors, just submissions for the site to post. Amaramoore (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the image used in the sandbox appears to be copyrighted. Copyrighted images must be hosted here instead of at Wikimedia Commons, and can only be used in mainspace, not in user sandboxes. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission to use the image though. Should I take it down? Amaramoore (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need proof that you have permission to use the image. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would a screenshot from the conversation be enough proof? Amaramoore (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I'm not an expert on images. You could ask at the Teahouse. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Amaramoore: No, you would need an email from the author of the photo. Just as a note, the author of the photograph is not necessarily the person depicted in the photo. See c:COM:VRT for more information. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 01:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	I just want to remind you that all your effort on this platform is not unnoticed and is greatly appreciated. Every edit counts. I admire that you chose to contribute to this encyclopedia. Hope you have a great experience here! QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 01:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Amaramoore/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (talk) 06:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]