User talk:AlexisNeva

October 2011[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WilliamH (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

blocked??[edit]

why have i been blocked from editing?? no warnings, just started editing?? whats going on??? this is crazy...i dont know what do do now?

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlexisNeva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just created an account, and now this happened, i dont know why i been blocked, i havent done anyting wrong??? please help AlexisNeva (talk) 06:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked because it appears that you are the operator of the Mathiassandell (talk) account. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathiassandell. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlexisNeva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

mathiassandell is my sibling who also uses the same computer, so thats why we have the same numbers/code. AlexisNeva (talk) 9:44 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but claiming your little brother is to blame just doesn't fly. You were editing the same page as the other account only minutes apart. TN X Man 14:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlexisNeva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

thats because he went into my account and started editing, when i just created mine, and when i hadnt log out he started editing!... AlexisNeva (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. @Two appeals open. Peridon (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlexisNeva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my sibling had been for some time an editor on wikipedia, and i thought i would too, so i crated my account, but i didnt know we had same numbers..and when he got warnings he went to mine account to start editing.... AlexisNeva (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So this account is compromised? Even if this story is true, that's a reason to leave the block in place. Peridon (talk) 15:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}

ublock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlexisNeva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no, he told me when i asked about this and why this is happened to me, i havent cmpromised anything! Cant you delete both accounts and i can create a new one?AlexisNeva (talk) 15:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted, we can't delete accounts, but you can start a new one, although I'd suggest not editing anything in any way related to what you were editing before and/or disclosing that you had this account. You may well want to do this, as it's evident here that you're not going to get unblocked because you admitted this account was compromised, and we just leave compromised accounts blocked. So, because any further unblock requests will be a pointless typing exercise, I'm revoking access to this talk page. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If anyone else has access to your account, it is compromised. That is a way of saying we don't know who made any edits. Compromised accounts are blocked. We cannot delete accounts, but they may remain blocked. Peridon (talk) 15:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamp

Target

Expires

Blocking admin

Block parameters

Reason

16:46, 17 October 2011

AlexisNeva (talk | contribs)

no expiry set

WilliamH (talk | contribs)

account creation blocked

(Abusing multiple accounts)