User talk:Alexbarbershop

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Alexbarbershop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:LACountySupervisorialDistrics.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LACountySupervisorialDistrics.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:LACountySupervisorialDistrics.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LACountySupervisorialDistrics.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits[edit]

Hi Alexbarbershop. It appears that most or all of your edits are marked as minor edits, regardless of whether they are minor or not, and that sets you up for problems. Your credibility and honesty are vulnerable, and such markings may make it hard for other editors to AGF in your editing, and that wouldn't be good.

I don't know how it happened that they are all marked as minor, because it usually takes a deliberate change of your settings for this to happen. Maybe you should take a look at your settings and fix it.

There is actually never any real need to mark an edit as minor, so nothing will be lost if you don't do it, and it's better to not mark a minor edit as minor than to mark a potentially controversial edit as minor, because the last is deceptive. Otherwise, carry on with the good work. -- BullRangifer (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DNC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve EBOT Streetcar[edit]

Hi, I'm Bfpage. Alexbarbershop, thanks for creating EBOT Streetcar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I question the inclusion of this article in Wikipedia because it describes a barely notable publication from 2014.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Bfpage _{let's talk...} 23:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alexbarbershop. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EBOT Streetcar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EBOT Streetcar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBOT Streetcar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Supervisor Kathryn Barger.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Supervisor Kathryn Barger.jpg, which you've attributed to County of Los Angeles. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 18:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alexbarbershop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alexbarbershop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Los Angeles County Supervisorial Districts[edit]

The article Los Angeles County Supervisorial Districts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Identical to a section in Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, which is the main article for this topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to United States, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • C • L)} 14:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Alexbarbershop[edit]

User:Alexbarbershop, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alexbarbershop and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Alexbarbershop during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 22:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

D&E MEDIA moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, D&E MEDIA, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 13:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please work on this in the draftspace. None of the references constitute a reliable source that establishes notability. GPL93 (talk) 13:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dude leave the fucking page alone notability can't be established if you're constantly vandalizing my edits. company is notable if for nothing else its role in belle knox scandal. if this is a work thing you should recuse. Alexbarbershop (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody vandalized your edits. The article you created has not been deleted, it's been moved to the draft space where you can continue to work on it until notability is established. Also, consider behaving more kindly towards other users and assume good faith. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alexbarbershop[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Alexbarbershop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (this has been litigated before in my favor, user GPL93 is personally attacking me for trying to post a page about the company that owns Ghettogaggers. This is the page GPL93 is trying to stop from being published. https://web.archive.org/web/20220908134247/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D&E_MEDIA) --Alexbarbershop (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't nominate your userpage for deletion. You need to add RS to prove the subject is notable, and it's possible that it could be which is why it was draftified and not nominated for deletion. Maybe a redirect to Belle Knox is more appropriate until then? GPL93 (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D&E MEDIA (September 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D&E MEDIA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alexbarbershop! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Lard Almighty. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Teal Swan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Lard Almighty (talk) 06:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexbarbershop! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Teal Swan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jonah Shacknai. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. I have removed the paragraph as it violates WP:NPOV. The referencing is also not really reliable as it is editorial speculation from a true crime site and not news reporting GPL93 (talk) 13:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from violating WP:NPOV. Such as your recent edits to Guillermo Ford and United States House Select Committee on Assassinations. Continually violating NPOV can lead to topic bans or even a block from editing. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexbarbershop: if you continue to violate WP:NPOV and push WP:FRINGE theories as fact on articles. You could very well be blocked from editing. GPL93 (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 04:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

ATTENTION WP:CONTENTDISPUTE | WP:SEEKHELP

Re: GPL93 Konkorde & Acroterion

Happy New Year!

But is it..happy? Really? Happinesas eludes me in a world where the truth is so vehemently and banally suppressed by the machinations of ... whatever one attributes responsibility to this phenomena.

The content you and others have suppressed is entirely verifiable, as to any quips pertaining to my remarks on potential conflict of interest based edit reversions and censorship by yourself and others, kindly note that CIA has been repeatedly caught editing Wikipedia pages containing references to their activities.

See Also:

^{https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816}

^{https://www.wired.com/2007/08/wiki-tracker/}

^{http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6947532.stm}

^{https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/andrewkaczynski/the-eight-best-edits-to-wikipedia-from-a-cia-ip-address}

^{https://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2010/08/cia-fbi-computers-used-for-wikipedia.html}

^{https://www.smh.com.au/national/cia-and-vatican-edit-wikipedia-entries-20070819-gdqwa2.html}

^{https://www.trendhunter.com/trends/wikipedia-cia-vatican}

^{https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200051567_Wikipedia_'shows_CIA_page_edits'}

My - I think it was 20+ - citations are more than ample to indicate verifiable data and Bugliosi did repeatedly perjure himself according to Tom O'Neill's 'Chaos', thus discrediting him as a reliable.. anything, further supported by the various public documents O'Neill uncovered to demonstrate that.

I actually restrained my own edits related to Bugliosi and had not yet included the allegations from Chaos that Vince once beat an employee/mistress of his who he had impregnated in an affair so violently that she miscarried the child of theirs she had refused to abort, due to her catholic faith - which was the point of the beating since the Helter Skelter author was forever seeking higher office. Nor did I include the provably truthful allegations that a milkman the late prosecutor was certain had been sleeping with his wife that he harassed and intimidated to the point that the man sued him for abusing his public office to harass the man extrajudicially, moved and changed their phone number, the latter being well documented by the contemporaneous court papers related to restraining orders filed and litigation from the milkman's family.

As for Olson, I think you's have to be pretty dim to look at the facts of the case, from the primary source data (Eric Olson commissioned medical examination, 1994, WaPo) and conclude that no foul play occurred in Frank's death.

There was a CIA employee in the room with him at the time of the 13-story fall.

I can't say for instance that any specific person was found guilty of the crime of murdering Frank Olson, however, given that the intelligence connected journalist Seymour Herst has admitted that the death was a CIA hit due to Frank's suspected ethical qualms with (well documented, now) illegal US government activities he had become aware in his classified work in biological weaponry, and that no other plausible explanation exists for how he became injured in the precise manner he did, it is fraudulent to deny that at the very least, Olson was murdered, and that, at the very least, the only plausible motive for this murder would be to conceal the classified information that Olson was privy to as part of his work, as surely he would have been far more valuable to foreign intelligence alive than dead, and the man had no other potential enemies.

And again, and I cannot overstate this;

There was a CIA agent in the room with him when he "fell" from the 13th story of the Penn Hotel...

Yet Frank landed on the pavement with injuries not possible if the version of events GPL93, Koncorde and Acroterion are diligently protecting, regardless whether this is another example of CIA Wikipedia Editing or not, it is a disingenuous and intellectually fraudulent perversion of historical events that is being rammed down the proverbial throat of the public by these three, and of course the CIA, who has been pushing that particular narrative I am pushing back against since Frank died.

Given that the entire point of GPL93, Koncorde, Acroterion and whoever else I've been ignoring who has been badgering me on my talk page appears to be primarily an effort to waste my time, lest I spend more of it it removing scurrilous disinformation from other pages related to CIA misconduct, such as their role in designing the Jonestown Massacre or their Murder of Bobby Kennedy.

So for the any impartial editors interested in enforcing Wikimedia's Information quality management and Conflict-of-interest editing guidelines, please review my censored edits below of the following Wikipedia pages, which I happen to have archived for this purpose exactly:

Frank Olson (Internet Archive)

Latah (Internet Archive)

Reclaiming History (Internet Archive)

References Used (More)

Note that many of these are scholarly histories which the entire premise is that the Warren Commission was either a deliberate cover-up or recklessly incompetent (it was the former, if anyone was wondering still), but specifically these are the references that GPL93 keeps removing, which if not vandalism constitutes censorship given that no specific information quality concern has been put forth - indicating that the edit reversions are indeed purely motivated by a desire to suppress information, for ...whatever reason one might want to do such a thing....

O'Neill, Tom (2019). Chaos : Charles Manson, the CIA, and the secret history of the sixties. ISBN 978-0-316-52921-1. OCLC 1103917682.

Weisberg, Harold (2013). Whitewash : the report on the Warren Report. Skyhorse Publishing. ISBN 978-1-62636-110-2. OCLC 868907283.

Jay., EPSTEIN, Edward (1966). Inquest: the Warren Commission and the establishment of truth: introduction by Richard H. Rovere. Hutchinson. OCLC 560363000.

Raskin, Marcus; Lane, Mark (1966). "Rush to Judgment". The Yale Law Journal. 76 (3): 581. doi:10.2307/794973. ISSN 0044-0094.

Meagher, Sylvia (2013). Accessories after the fact : the Warren Commission, the Authorities & the Report on the JFK Assassination. Skyhorse Publishing, Inc. ISBN 978-1-62873-423-2. OCLC 857364779.

Roffman, Howard (1975). Presumed guilty : Lee Harvey Oswald in the assassination of President Kennedy. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. OCLC 476186358.

Summers, Anthony (2013). Not in your lifetime : the defining book on the JFK assassination. Open Road Integrated Media. ISBN 978-1-4804-3548-3. OCLC 844729011.

Lesar, James H.; Kurtz, Michael L. (1983). "Crime of the Century: The Kennedy Assassination from a Historian's Perspective". The Journal of American History. 70 (2): 469. doi:10.2307/1900299. ISSN 0021-8723.

Wecht, Cyril H.; Hurt, Henry (1986). "Reasonable Doubt: An Investigation into the Assassination of John F. Kennedy". The Journal of American History. 73 (2): 437. doi:10.2307/1908231. ISSN 0021-8723.

Marrs, Jim. Crossfire: the plot that killed Kennedy. ISBN 978-0-465-03180-1. OCLC 931327170.

H., Melanson, Philip (1990). Spy saga : Lee Harvey Oswald and U.S. intelligence. Greenwood. ISBN 0-275-93571-X. OCLC 22663236.

DiEugenio, James (2013). Destiny betrayed : JFK, Cuba, and the Garrison case. Skyhorse. ISBN 978-1-62087-056-3. OCLC 815366082.

Smith, Matthew (2003). JFK : the second plot. Mainstream Pub. ISBN 978-1-84018-501-0. OCLC 973585606.

Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri; Newman, John (1996). "Oswald and the CIA". The Journal of American History. 83 (2): 708. doi:10.2307/2945095. ISSN 0021-8723.

Weisberg, Harold (2013). Never Again! : the Government Conspiracy in the JFK Assassination. Skyhorse Publishing, Inc. ISBN 978-1-62873-515-4. OCLC 857364766.

Galanor, Stewart (1998). Cover-up. Kestrel Books. ISBN 0-9662772-0-1. OCLC 231779705.

R., Wrone, David (2003). The Zapruder film : reframing JFK's assassination. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0-7006-1291-2. OCLC 52478401.

Knott, Stephen (2006). "Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why". History: Reviews of New Books. 35 (1): 26–26. doi:10.1080/03612759.2006.10526986. ISSN 0361-2759.

Kurtz, Michael L. (2006). The JFK assassination debates : lone gunman versus conspiracy. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0-7006-1474-5. OCLC 70219772.

United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Assassinations (2007). Report of the Select Committee on Assassinations, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session : findings and recommendations. Ipswich, MA: Mary Ferrell Foundation-Press. ISBN 978-0-9790099-6-9. OCLC 123118078.

94th United States Congress, 2nd Session; et al. (Committee Chairman Senator Frank Church, Senator John Tower, Senator Philip Hart, Senator Howard Baker, Senator Walter Mondale, Senator Barry Goldwater, Senator Walter Huddleston, Senator Charles Mathias, Senator Robert Burren Morgan, Senator Richard Schweiker, Senator Gary Hart) (1975). Church Committee Investigation Of The Assassination Of President John F. Kennedy § Performance Of The Intelligence Agencies. Final Report Of The Select Committee To Study Governmental Operations With Respect To Intelligence Activities United States Senate. SENATE REPORT No. 94-755. Vol. 5. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Publishing Office.

"Telephone conversation # 135, sound recording, LBJ and J. EDGAR HOOVER, 11/29/1963, 1:40PM · Discover Production". www.discoverlbj.org. Retrieved 2022-12-24.

McClintock, Pamela (2013-10-06). "Box Office (Specialty): J.F.K. Assassination Pic 'Parkland' Struggles". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 2022-12-24.

Kenny, Terrence (May 15, 2007). "JFK Conspiracy Theories: A Book to Disprove Them All". ABC News. Retrieved February 27, 2013.

Burrough, Bryan (May 20, 2007). "Or No Conspiracy?". The New York Times. New York. Retrieved February 27, 2013.

Kingsbury, Alex (June 3, 2007). "The Final Verdict". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved February 27, 2013.

Donoghue, Steve (July 1, 2007). "He Died". www.openlettersmonthly.com. Open Letters Monthly. Retrieved February 27, 2013.

Talbot, David (May 17, 2007). "Bugliosi vs. "Brothers": The attorney's massive new tome gets Bobby Kennedy wrong". Salon. Retrieved May 26, 2013.

"Four Days in November" W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. Retrieved January 14, 2018

December 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 03:23, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep asserting that the CIA is reverting your edits, or that editors who disagree with you are acting on behalf of the CIA, you may face sanctions. You may have to resign yourself to the possibility that people simply disagree with you, or that your edits violate Wikipedia policy. Acroterion (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: not heading this warning. He reverted back Frank Olson to the conspiracy pushing version, which appears to be partially synthesized by themself in addition to serious editorializing. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My warning is limited to assertions that editors are acting on behalf of the CIA when this editor's changes are disputed. However, Alexbarbershop is warned against editorializing - "Olson's death is among many open wounds remaining from the CIA mind control project MKUltra" is an example of inappropriate editorializing in Wikipedia's voice. Alexbarbershop is warned to gain consensus for changes first, using the article talkpage. Acroterion (talk) 16:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. GPL93 (talk) 15:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My rebuttal to Harassment & Censorship by Acroterion and GPL93[edit]