User talk:Aimilios92

August 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued edit warring and civility issues.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 21:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked on August 7 for edit warring and behavioral issues, both have which have continued after the block expired. You have been edit warring at Suella Braverman persistently within the past two days [1][2][3][4]. In addition, the behavioral issues that contributed you your initial block has continued after the block expired. Rather than commenting on the content and not the contributor on the article's talk page, there is instead continued accusations of bias and insinuations that because someone was previously blocked that there is some issue with them participating in the discussion. These behaviors are not acceptable in a collaborative editing environment, and because there is no indication that these behaviors will cease with a timed block, I have set the block to indefinite, as I indicated would be likely here. - Aoidh (talk) 21:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? Aimilios92 (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I would encourage you to read WP:5P4, the fourth of Wikipedia's five pillars. Civility is not merely a good idea, it is crucial to how Wikipedia functions. - Aoidh (talk) 21:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will do that and take time off to ensure I abide by the rules. May I ask you to reconsider the block? Aimilios92 (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the block is not necessary or at some point no longer becomes necessary I would advise you to follow the instructions in the block notice above, particularly keeping in mind Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. However, given the continued behavior immediately after the expiration of the previous block, I do not think the block needs to be adjusted at this time. There's no reason for edit summaries like this except to be antagonistic. - Aoidh (talk) 23:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 16:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]