User talk:Adminor

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.(strictly, from someone else) —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 12:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Serial Number 54129:This is my job. Thank you. Adminor (talk | contribs) 13:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not for much longer, I'm very much afraid. —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 13:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adminor, do you understand that you need to provide reasons for your reverts and ideally discuss them on the article's talk page? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @NeilN: Thank you for this message . Yes ofcourse. I'll doing. Adminor (talk | contribs) 04:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

You hsve been here only a very short time, and you are doing things which are best left to editors possessing greater experience. I expect that you will be able to get your present block lifted after you have chosen an acceptable username; may I suggest that when this has happened you spend some time just making edits, initially small ones, to article text, and only go on to things needing more experience until you actually have this experience. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes after revert i have read all en wiki rules. But thank you very much for this suggestion my pleasure so you suggestion me. Adminor (talk | contribs) 04:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Conquest of Bread, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 12:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the point here is that you need to slow down anad make sure you have a good reason for your reverts. Unregistered users make many positive contributions here and blindly reverting them without reason harms rather than helps the project. You may want to consider WP:CVUA to help you get a handle on how to properly do this sort of work. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I echo Beeblebrox in that you need to slow down and make sure that what you're reverting is justified and explainable. You remind me of myself a few years back (a "younger Oshwah" as I would call it I guess), because I also had this issue... I'd make mistakes because I'd patrol and revert changes wayyyy too fast and where I wasn't allowing myself to take a quick moment and make sure that I wasn't messing something up. Remember: there is never a rush to do anything on Wikipedia. Honor quality over quantity and accuracy over speed - it's what you need to do if you want to jump the hurdle from being a novice and "young" editor and start being seen by others as an experienced and mature one ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Oshwah: for this word. But I don't have experience like you, but next time i'll also doing the better. Adminor (talk | contribs) 06:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't compare yourself to other editors like that - focus on your own experience and what you'd like to do for this project, and everything else will fall into place naturally :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: okay. i'm focus on my own experience and what i like to do for this project. But Oshwah i need your help, I like to send welcome message for all new users, can I do for always and can i get this permission forever? Adminor (talk | contribs) 07:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need anyone's permission to welcome new users to Wikipedia. If you like doing that - go for it! I don't see how this is being seen as problematic at all :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Oshwah:. i'll giving the best edits in en wiki. Adminor (talk | contribs) 08:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —DoRD (talk) 11:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]