User talk:ANE was Nordic

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ANE was Nordic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Peaceray (talk) 05:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent comments[edit]

Before continuing to comment, please make sure you read the talk page guidelines at WP:TPG. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please - your edits to talk pages are inappropriate. I can see why you might think they were ok because too often posts are left up that should have been removed. because they are just arguing about the subject of the article. Which is why when I've deleted your posts I've at times deleted the post you responded to. You're new and aren't expected to understand how we work.

Have to ask - ANE? Ancient Near East? Doug Weller talk 08:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It means Siberians. Siberia is North. ANE was Nordic (talk) 16:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is probably a reference to this, doug. Licks-rocks (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I am part indigenous Northward American and I like that ANE lived in a Nordic environment similar to what my tribe lived in (in Nord Canada). ANE was Nordic (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Rsk6400. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Sons of Confederate Veterans that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Referring to your sentence "You at least should stop pretending you do not have an extreme bias" which seemed to address the editor of the preceding comment. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think you're misunderstanding what I had said, there was an extreme bias evident in the previous poster's comment. You seem like someone looking to wield power over others, and your own page suggests you have rather 'passionate', some might even say extreme, political perspectives, if nothing else held with the dedication of an extremist. I wont take you seriously because you present as though you are 'out to get' other users, which is totally unacceptable. Thanks for listening and adjusting your behavior accordingly. ANE was Nordic (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA. I profess "a profound dislike of all forms of racism" on my page. Do you call that "extreme political perspectives" ? Rsk6400 (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History and many events, people, cultures, etc. today, feature many racist people, customs, cultural attitudes, etc. you do not have to be racist, like racists, or like racism to present an unbiased view of racists and racism. You have an obligation to be impartial and present non-biased facts. You do not combat hateful lies with loving lies. You combat lies, of any form, with facts.

Brandishing your bias so brazenly is considered by some to be a form of extremism. ANE was Nordic (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 21:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ANE was Nordic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

None of the numerous modifications I have made were disruptive or damaging. All of my posts on 'talk' pages were in defense of the integrity of information and in pointing out user bias influencing unwarranted changes or the addition of bias into an otherwise neutral informative format. Doug Weller has unjustly blocked me because it personally does not like me for my distaste of bias in the topics I am interested in. I am clearly and obviously here to build an encyclopedia as my actions have shown. My edits being correction of poor grammar and my 'talk' contributions being in defense of integrity. This block is entirely unwarranted and Doug has some personal hangup that should have disqualified them from holding the position they hold long ago. This is apparent especially to Doug and I know I will not be unblocked because Doug will remain mad and take this as a personal attack when I have been completely objective. Doug should familiarize themself with Wikipedia's policy on 'Here to build an encyclopedia' and how blocking is not to be used as a tool to 'punish' someone you simply disagree with. ANE was Nordic (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to be unblocked, you would need to understand that your start to Wikipedia has caused some problems. Opposition to racism is not a viewpoint that concerns me, but it seems to concern you. You could still edit Wikipedia and become a productive contributor, but you would need to dial down the talk page posts. Have a think about what I have said, and take your time before posting another unblock request. Blaming Doug and saying he shouldn't be an admin doesn't help your case. A more thoughtful unblock request could lead to an unblock. PhilKnight (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.