User talk:88.159.237.227

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (88.159.237.227) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jealous (Nick Jonas song), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read WP:SONGCOVER. Binksternet (talk) 21:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Jonas (album), without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. –Chase (talk / contribs) 16:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Nick Jonas discography. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. –Chase (talk / contribs) 17:36, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:88.159.237.227 reported by User:Chasewc91 (Result: ). Thank you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 17:39, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:12, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Remix EPs are considered maxi-singles; this is seen at numerous featured and good articles about songs, including the FA 4 Minutes (Madonna song). Consensus for this has been determined through numerous discussions at WT:MUSIC and related venues. Please do not continue to change this at Nick Jonas discography without discussion. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jealous (Nick Jonas song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 20:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Acalamari 10:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing[edit]

Never, under any circumstances, restore unsourced material to an article after it has been removed for being unsourced, even if you feel it is "common knowledge". In that condition, inline citations to reliable sources are absolutely mandatory.—Kww(talk) 06:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, read WP:RS. Jimdo.com is not a reliable source under any definition.—Kww(talk) 06:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you do it, you will be blocked. You cannot restore the material before finding a reliable source. Do not restore the material before including the source.—Kww(talk) 06:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lying isn't helpful, either: here is the diff showing you adding jimdo.com as a source.—Kww(talk) 06:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

72 hour block this time. This is foundational policy here: don't restore material that has been challenged for bad sourcing without providing reliable sources at the same time. It's not acceptable to restore huge blocks of challenged material and then go looking for reliable sources.—Kww(talk) 06:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 20:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 23:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Last Year Was Complicated. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bare URL's are linkrot; please fully cite your sources. livelikemusic talk! 15:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Again, please fully cite your sources. Bare URL's are linkrot. livelikemusic talk! 03:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to LunchMoney Lewis. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 07:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Last Year Was Complicated. I do not understand why it's so hard for you to formally cite sources, and to stop relaying on Oceanup.com, which is not highly reliable. livelikemusic talk! 12:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Safehouse Records. livelikemusic talk! 12:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference errors on 18 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Booboo Stewart page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Per your edits to Hailee Steinfeld discography, please be clear about which charts peaks were achieved on. What you inserted into the page implied the number 35 peak of "Fragile" was achieved on the Dance/Electronic Songs chart, when it was the Digital version of that chart only (Dance/Electronic Digital Songs), which is not the main chart. Furthermore, do not use josephvinaixa as a source for anything on Wikipedia. It is a blog and not reliable per WP:ALBUMAVOID. Also, please start providing more to the references you add than just bare URLs. These can be subject to link rot. Thank you. Ss 112 08:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your additions to Still Got Time, the Dutch Top 40 is not published by MegaCharts. MegaCharts publishes the Single Top 100. Ss 112 09:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Still Got Time. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Please stop adding bare URLs. Fill out your references. Ss 112 14:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.