User talk:2012Dance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2

Image copyright problem with Image:Celinestoribio.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Celinestoribio.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mrodnew.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrodnew.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to add a copyright tag. The MRodNew.jpg photo was found on several online media reporting websites such as latina.com and so on. I'm not sure what the actual script tag would be for this. Can you assist? 2012Dance (talk) 18:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Celinesnew.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Celinesnew.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just as with the MRodnew.jpg image, I'm not sure how to add a copyright tag, which one, and so forth. The image was taked from Ms. Toribio's official website and used with permission of Ms. Toribio. How would this then be listed/tagged? I'm not familiar with the proper structuring of the tags. Any help would be appreciated in this matter. Thank you. 2012Dance (talk) 18:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Celines[edit]

Hi, I’ve put the text here. Note the following

  • I had already deleted the image separately. Images must be GFDL or Public Domain. If it’s not your own photo, you will have to prove that you have permission to use it under those terms
  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page with a link to where we can find that note.
  • Your message said pasted. If the text is copied from a website, sooner or later, a bot will tag it for deletion as a copyright violation
  • Although it has one independent reference, more independent verifiable sources would help to show that it meets the notability guidelines.
  • just a MoS thing, only the first word of the headings should be capitalised, and the first mention of her name should be bold

jimfbleak (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remove any fan-ish sounding POV. Also, I can find and reference articles which back up some of the factual info I had up. As for the image, I will leave the message and send the email no problem. I'll also be sure to change the heading and bold the name. :) I'll try to follow all the guidelines you suggested and have the article up today with such corrections. Thanks for your help by the way. 2012Dance (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide proof, not just a claim thereof, to your claims of permission for use. The best way to do this is via WP:OTRS, otherwise the images &/or text will continually be deleted. SkierRMH (talk) 18:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only way to use any non-free images is to follow the directions that you've looked through. Elsewise, the images will probably be deleted (faked &/or mis-labeled licenses are not a good idea, and a good way to get blocked permanently as a copyright violator) SkierRMH (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Licensing numbers" doesn't have anything to do with copyright - just look at the source of where the pics are from (sometimes not on the specific web page but on the site's privacy notice or other such page) to see the specific copyright limitations. SkierRMH (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks much better; images are a minefield, I'm afraid jimfbleak (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Fast & Furious (2009 film) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shell babelfish 12:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fast_&_Furious_(2009_film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bihco (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Claudettelali.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Claudettelali.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk) 17:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm setting this page up for Ms. Lali. She owns the photo but we don't have any liscensing info and it's far too complicated process on Wikipedia to bother with trying to figure out what exactly we need to do, so just delete it. Thanks. 2012Dance (talk) 18:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claudette Lali for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claudette Lali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudette Lali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 01:06, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]