User talk:112.166.178.43

Your recent edits[edit]

I asked the other user to stop and it seems that I should ask the same thing from you. Stop edit warring and don't insult each other in your edit summaries. You both may end up being blocked and banned from the community. Take the matter to the article's talk page and discuss it politely. Keivan.f^Talk 07:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He clearly doesn't understand the film so what is he doing putting a plot summary on there?? You should block him.

You may have violated the three-revert rule, for what it's worth. - Purplewowies (talk) 08:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

"A man confesses to killing a man but then it turns out he may not have killed the man."

Seriously?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

112.166.178.43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It clearly isn't fair that I'm blocked whilst his nonsense summary is allowed to remain. It demeans the entire article.

Decline reason:

Not an unblock rationale. The summary being poor is not a license for fighting in the page history. Maybe you'll get more support by proposing a rewrite on the talk page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

112.166.178.43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How am I supposed to propose a rewrite in the talk page when I'm blocked? The fighting only happened because that stupid fucking prol kept reinstating his pathetic summary.

Decline reason:

Block extended, talk page access revoked. This sort of personal attack isn't tolerated here. Yamla (talk) 11:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.