User talk:103.210.146.85

October 2021[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2022[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I am not evading[edit]

My block period got over on 15 th January.I am editing and using the references along with it . 103.210.146.85 (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your original block on this IP expired. However since you're also blocked as 1.38.216.0/21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) (to name just one range), you're still evading a block. FDW777 (talk) 08:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fdw The other IP address which you have mentioned[edit]

I don't have much idea about it .I just now about myself I was blocked and the now time period is over .Hence I am editing and I am not evading. Most of the edits I make, I always provide references along the not one but two to three. Hence I believe ain't doing anything wrong. 103.210.146.85 (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You provide so-called references that don't even support the claims you are making. Anyway I've wasted enough time with you. I know you've evaded your block using many IPs, you know you've evaded your block using many IPs, the blocking admin(s) know you've evaded your block using many IPs. Deny it as much as you like, the facts don't change. FDW777 (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FDW777 i also added Wsj reference for Valeant Pharmaceuticals Tax inversion[edit]

the wsj reference proved it was tax inversion and domtar reference was also correct. You need to acknowledge the references.As I say they are some people who are copying me and editing in a wrong way without reference, I can't take responsibility for their actions we both know it. 103.210.146.85 (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This ain't justice blocking innocent editors[edit]

I obeyed all rules of Wikipedia 103.210.146.85 (talk) 14:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.