User talk:06whitec

Welcome![edit]

Hello 06whitec! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Lakers 20:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2007[edit]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Kim Jong-il. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —dgies^t_c 20:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Percy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Percy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Percy.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Percy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

With regard to your comments on User:Blaaaahh: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —dgies^t_c 02:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School, Faversham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bonadea 21:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to MySpace. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ^talkGiler 17:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel[edit]

A tag has been placed on List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 21:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel[edit]

A tag has been placed on List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 21:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. FlyingToaster 21:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Benches[edit]

Hello 06whitec. I have nothing against your benches, but information such as lists of items really would be better off in the main article rather than as an article unto itself. Items that have their own articles have to pass Wikipedia's criteria for notability: that it must have received significant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Things like lists of benches really aren't on their own notable. FlyingToaster 23:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel[edit]

I have nominated List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List Of Benches In The Leys School Chapel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. FlyingToaster 02:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arrogance[edit]

How many schools have chapels? Do you not think it rather arrogant to write up one specific chapel at school chapel? You will find your text at Memorial Chapel, The Leys School. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey 06whitec, don't let other people's anger get to you. Your articles might need a bit of work, but keep practicing and if you're starting a new page, maybe copy the layout from a template or an article with a high rating. --rakkar (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]