User talk:بیکار

Warning[edit]

Your addition on Cyrus the Great is in bad English and has been reverted. Unless you can fix your English, do not undo my revert. That is called edit warring and will result in sanctions, restricting your possibilities to edit Wikipedia. Debresser (talk) 16:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

my edits doesn't any matter, maybe you have some trouble with non-Europian characters. like cyrus the great! --بیکار (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

February 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Cyrus the Great shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 07:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you didn't warn user Debresser, can't see what sabotage he does on Cyrus the Great article? who gave him permission to delete academic source ?--بیکار (talk) 08:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with your source or the information itself. My only problem is that the paragraph you add is not in English. I don't even understand what you are trying to say. Please write it in good English, and I'll be happy to assess the information and its source. Debresser (talk) 09:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Dougweller's warning and with Debresser's comment. I don't have a problem with "non-Europian characters": there are no non-European typographic characters in your addition, so I assume you're trying to paint Debresser as xenophobic. Note, this is only an assumption since your English is a bit challenged. I have reverted you again: be advised that continuing to edit-war will inevitably lead to a block. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Dandamayev[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Dandamayev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Drmies (talk) 15:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Papers[edit]

You have two requested papers (here and here) ready for download. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 22:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much --بیکار (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The JSTOR article is available here. As for the book, could you provide the specific page numbers? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 20:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot. nothing, i got that book. thanks again. --بیکار (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books[edit]

First book: [1][2][3][4][5]
Second book: [6][7][8]
OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 21:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

so quick. thanks very much.--بیکار (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First one is available in open access from Google Scholar. Here's 2 and 3. Also, please indent by using : in front of your message to improve conversation readability. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 02:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can view the pages but they don't allow me to download the content. Sorry. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 16:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]