User:Lee Vilenski/GA Criteria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Quick fails - Check for copyright issues. This ones a big one. Do it first.
If the article is missing a serious amount of content (where you would expect some), it's not WP:BROAD
  • Referencing - is everything sourced? If not, it's WP:OR, and needs a source. That doesn't neccesarily mean every sentence, but every statement should be cited in some way.
Are all the sources reliable? Unreliable sources shouldn't really be in a GA, (there are a couple exceptions, but for now ignore this).
Are the references uniform? I like to have the same date format, archive-urls and things like ISBN and doi links exist. There's a few scripts that can do this, and I'd offer them to anyone who asks).
Notes, under most circumstances should have a citation too.
  • Prose - the WP:LEDE should be error free. I usually spend most of my time checking through the lede. A weak lede sucks. Things like having citations in the lede is usually a no-no for me.
Watch out for WP:INFOBOXCITE. If things are in the infobox, and not in the prose... Why not? (sometimes they can't be put in organically, but things like birth dates should be in there somewhere).
Is there bad wording? Spellng mistkes? Point it out in the review.
If something doesn't make sense (which can be quite common), point it out.