User:Elwhoelwu/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moor frog
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Ranidae
Genus: Rana
Species:
R. arvalis
Binomial name
Rana arvalis
Nilsson, 1842
The male can be coloured blue for a short period during the breeding season.

The moor frog (Rana arvalis) is a slim, reddish-brown, semiaquatic amphibian native to Europe and Asia. It is a member of the family Ranidae, or true frogs. The frog is known for its expansive range covering a significant portion of Eurasia. Male frogs are also known to develop temporary blue coloration for mating. The frog has an IUCN listing of Least Concern. France and Romania independently consider the frog nearly extinct and critically endangered, respectively.[2][3]

Taxonomy[edit]

The family the moor frog belongs to, Ranidae, is a broad group containing 605 species. The family is like a “catch-all” for ranoid frogs that do not belong to any other families.[4] Since this is the case, the characteristics that define them are more general, and the frogs are found all throughout the world, on every continent but Antarctica.

The moor frog's genus, Rana, is a little more specific. Frogs of this genus are found in Europe and Asia. The moor frog is not found in the Americas.

The moor frog's scientific name, Rana arvalis means "frog of the fields".[citation needed] It is also called the Altai brown frog because frogs from the Altai Mountains in Asia have been included in the R. arvalis species. The Altai frogs have some different characteristics such as shorter shins, but currently there is no official distinction and all frogs are known as one species—Rana arvalis.[1] The taxonomy may be better defined in the future.

Description[edit]

The moor frog is a small bog frog, characterized by an unspotted belly, a large, dark ear spot, and — often, not always — a pale stripe down the center of the back. They are generally described as a reddish-brown, but can also be yellow, gray, or light olive. Their bellies are white or yellow and they have a "bandit-like" black stripe going from their nose to their ears. They vary from 5.5 to 6.0 cm long, but can reach up to 7.0 cm in length; their heads are more tapered than those of the Common frog (Rana temporaria). The skin on their flanks and thighs is smooth, and the posterior tongue is forked and free. They have horizontal pupils, their feet are partially webbed, and their back legs are shorter than those of other species of frogs. Males are different from females because of the presence of nuptial pads on their first fingers and their paired guttural vocal sacs.[5]

Distribution and habitat[edit]

The moor frog’s range covers a large majority of Europe and Asia. Its east-west range extends from northeastern France and northern Belgium all the way to the Lena River in Siberia. Its north-south range extends as far north as the 69th parallel in Finland — where the sun is visible for 24 hours during the summer solstice— and as far south as the Pannonian basin in Central Europe. The moor frog can be found in a wide range of altitudes. In the western region of its range the moor frog can be found as high up as 900 meters above sea level, and in the eastern portion the moor frog can be found as high up as 2000 meters in the Altai.[6] Within this geographical range the moor frog is often found in bodies of still water with littoral vegetation and pH below 6.[6][7] The diversity of habitats demonstrates the frog’s plasticity towards habitat.[6]

The types of land moor frogs can inhabit are greatly varied. They live in tundra, forest tundra, forest, forest steppe, steppe, forest edges and glades, semideserts, swamps, meadows, fields, bush lands, and gardens. They prefer areas untouched by humans, such as damp meadows and bogs, but they still may be able to live in agricultural and urban areas.[1]

Moor frogs provide a good model for studying local adaptation as they experience a wide range of environments and are relatively limited in their movements.[8][9] Their restriction in movements implies limited gene flow and facilitates evolution through adaptive genetic differentiation among populations.[10]

Furthermore, a historical reference was also found from the 13th century by Bartholomeus Anglicus ("Rana palustres").[11] The species has been successfully bred in captivity in the UK and a reintroduction has been proposed as part of Celtic Reptile & Amphibian's rewilding plans.[12][13][14]

Historical Distribution[edit]

The earliest fossil record of the moor frog extends back to between the Pliocene and Early Pleistocene found in Dvorníky-Včeláre, Slovakia.[15] Other fossil records of the moor frog from the early Pleistocene were found on land that is inside the modern range of the moor frog.[15] Fossil records from the middle Pleistocene demonstrate the range extended as far south as south-central France and as far west as the eastern coast of the Great Britain.[15] Records from the late Pleistocene show the range extended as far south as Bosnia and Herzegovina and Azerbaijan.[15]

Distribution in Romania[edit]

There are three main regions where the moor frog can be found in Romania. The first is the Transylvanian region which includes the Western Plains, the Transylvanian Plateau, and the Eastern Carpathians. The second region is northern part of Romanian Moldavia. The third and smallest region is the Tisa River Basin—north of Maramureș.[16] The largest Romanian population of moor frog lives in the Western Plains.[16] The population of moor frog in Romanian Moldavia is isolated from the populations in Transylvania.[16] Most populations of moor frog in Romania are isolated and not contiguous.[16]

Each population may have 200-400 adults; however, exceptional populations of 2000 adults have been found as well. Most Romanian populations of moor frog can be found between 108-414 meters above sea level.[16] Exceptional populations have been found to exist at 740 meters above sea level.[16]  

Populations are isolated because of edge effects of human developments.[16] In Romania the moor frog is known to live in humid habitats that border land with human activity, such as flooded agricultural fields, ditches on the side of roads, small canals and streams, and human settlements.[16] The moor frog is sparingly found in habitats with little human activity. Swamps are one of the few habitats with little human activity that host moor frogs.[16]

Conservation[edit]

Population Threats[edit]

It is currently classified as Least Concern by the IUCN. However, the moor frog may soon be impacted by the destruction and pollution of breeding sites and adjacent habitats, mostly through urbanization, recreational use of waterside areas, and intensive agriculture. The species does not appear to be notably susceptible to chytridiomycosis, although the fungus has been detected in frogs in Germany.[1]

The 2009 IUCN Red List status of the moor frog does not properly reflect the current declining nature of the moor frog.[17] There is a general lack of research on the conservation status of the moor frog in many EU member states and in-range countries. However, a European Habitats Directive performed in 2013 revealed that 19 of the 28 member states of the time reported that conservation status of the moor frog were unfavorable. 11 of the 19 said that their status was in decline as well.[17] It is known that existing populations in Europe are small in number which indicate a significant loss of genetic diversity.[17] This lack of genetic diversity threatens the current stability of populations and long-term survival because of the increased risk of inbreeding.[17]  

12 helminth and nematode species are known to parasitize the Moor frog.[18] Trematode infection can cause the formation of cysts in larvae; particularly at areas undergoing metamorphosis.[19] These cysts can cause the formation of extra limbs, deformation to the vertebral skeleton. Frogs with these deformations are particularly susceptible to predation by the trematode’s final and definitive hosts.[19]

Conservation Status in France[edit]

The moor frog is considered nearly extinct in France where the western limit of the moor frog range extends. As of 2020, there are only four isolated populations in France. These four were once a contiguous metapopulation.[17] In France, moor frog habitats are limited and of poor quality due to significant human development that encroaches on and destroys moor frog habitats. Edge effects of human developments also fragment and degrade remaining habitats. Mild inbreeding greatly reduces the moor frog fitness due to the small number of individuals in these isolated populations,.[17]

Conservation Efforts[edit]

Acidification, eutrophication, and other forms of water pollution are negatively affecting the aquatic habitats of moor frogs which is exacerbating their already critical condition.[17] Moor frogs normally enjoy acidic environments; however, peat bogs which produce these acidic conditions have poor buffering properties that make them susceptible to drastic decreases of pH even below 4.5.[20][21] There are various conservation practices being initiated in order to remediate these pH driven affects.[20] Liming of peat bogs by adding chalk can increase pH.[20] Acidification of freshwater aquatic habitats has the detrimental effect of reduced biodiversity.[22] One study showed in highly acidic waters, pH 4.2, eggs of the Moor frog were especially susceptible to fungal infection.[22] Many eggs were infected and those that were had a mortality rate of 50%.[22] Organic sediment is removed from pools before the addition of limestone particles (<3mm) to prevent eutrophication.[22] Before liming of acidic waters, Moor frog eggs can expect to be infected with fungi 75-100% of the time. Liming treatment is able to reduce the presence of fungal infection to 0-25% of the time by increasing pH to 5-6.[22] While this method may allow for moor frog reproduction to occur in the short-term, the effect is only temporary and acidification will ultimately reoccur.[20] Protection and addition of riparian zones by preventing grazing and replanting littoral vegetation aids the rewetting process of drained land.[20] Drainage of land for agriculture is especially dangerous to the moor frog because they are prone to desiccation.[20] Conservation efforts undertaken for the moor frog are most effective when executed in small scale phases.[20] These small scale phases are more easily managed and receive more attention.[20]

Diet[edit]

An adult moor frog’s diet consists of any mobile and terrestrial animals that they can physically ingest. Moor frogs most commonly consume beetles; however, other insects from the orders hemiptera (true bugs), hymenoptera, and diptera (flies) are consumed as well. Non-insect invertebrate of orders e.g. gastropoda (snails and slugs), arachnida, and myriapoda (centipedes and millipedes) are observed to be consumed by moor frogs.[21] Beetles make up the majority of the moor frog's diet due to their abundance. Large moor frogs do appear to have a preference for beetles because they are larger than most other insect prey. Large moor frogs tend to consume large prey and small moor frogs consume small prey.[23] This behavior is assumed to have evolved to reduce competition between moor frogs and/or to maximize net energy gained from feeding. Larger moor frogs consume fewer small insects not out of generosity towards smaller moor frogs, but because all large moor frogs were once small moor frogs. Thus, if large moor frogs consumed large and small prey indifferently there may not be enough small prey for smaller moor frogs harming the moor frog and its genes. Aside from size preferences, individual moor frogs do not appear to prefer more energetically favorable prey over less energetically favorable prey of equal size.[21] The moor frog will ingest any animal that it is able to swallow and in close proximity. Moor frogs are opportunistic predators that wait for prey to appear before consuming them;[21] as opposed to intentional predators that actively hunt for prey. More mobile prey are more often consumed by the moor frog because of their opportunistic nature.

Plant matter and inedible objects such as pebbles are also found to be consumed by the moor frog.[21] Plant matter is found to be consumed in greater quantities when more prey has been consumed which suggests that plant matter is consumed accidentally during the capture of prey.[24] The moor frog’s shed skin is also consumed; however, it is unknown whether consumption of shed skin is accidental or intentional in nature.[24]

Mating[edit]

Multimale amplexus is the predominant method of mating that the moor frog performs.[25] This suggests that post-copulatory competition may be just as important as pre-copulatory competition. The sperm of male moor frogs compete in the female reproductive tract for fertilization of the female's egg.

Female frogs do not appear to prefer males of a particular size.[25] Females did prefer to mate with males that have successfully helped produce offspring with that female in the past.[25]

Long thumb length suggests poor sperm quality, and short thumb length suggests greater sperm quality. Males with quality sperm bred progeny with greater chances of survival. Despite this correlation, female individuals did not appear to prefer thumb length or be able to detect variation in thumb length.[25]

Blue Coloration[edit]

Male moor frogs turn a conspicuous blue during its mating season but only for a few days during peak reproductive activity;[26] females remain brown during this time. While the blue is conspicuous to human vision, the greatest color change in male moor frogs occurs in the ultraviolet region from 350-450nm, invisible to human vision.[27] Again, this shift in reflectance does not appear in female moor frogs.

Males who have mated appeared bluer and were recorded as having higher body temperatures.[26][27] Males who have higher body temperatures also appeared bluer.[26] Change in reflectance could be a method of intrasexual communication that signal an individual’s sex. Males in a multimale amplexus (multiple males mate with a single female frog) will be able to more easily differentiate a frog’s sex if males are bright blue versus a brown female. Male moor frogs will not mount an individual if they have bright blue coloration. This is evolutionary advantageous because males that are able to differentiate coloration will be not be susceptible to wasting their sperm and time mistakenly mating with another male.

Blue reflectance may also be a form of intersexual communication.[27] It is hypothesized that males with brighter blue coloration may signal greater sexual and genetic fitness;[27] however, studies have only revealed tadpoles fathered by bright blue individuals had greater chances of survival when pitted against large beetle larvae than when fathered by dull individuals.[27]

Ecology[edit]

Hibernation[edit]

A pair of moor frogs in amplexus near Hamburg, Germany.

Moor frogs will hibernate sometime between September and June, depending on the latitude of the location. Frogs in southwestern, plain habitats will leave later (around November or December) and return earlier (February). However, frogs in cold, polar areas will disappear sooner (in September) and return later (in June).[28]

Breeding[edit]

The mating season takes place between March and June right after the end of hibernation. Males form breeding choruses, and their songs sound similar to those of the agile frog, (Rana dalmatina). Their calls can "sound like air escaping from a submerged empty bottle: 'waug...waug...waug'. Males can also develop bright-blue coloration for a few days during the season.[29]

The spawning happens very quickly and is completed in 3 to 28 days. The spawn of each frog is laid in one or two clusters of 500-3000 eggs in warm, shallow waters.

Metamorphosis[edit]

Metamorphosis happens between June and October. Larvae are about 45 mm long and dark in color with small dots. When the larvae transform into tadpoles, their diet consists of algae and small invertebrates. The adult frogs' feeding is halted during the breeding season, but their diets consist of insects and various invertebrates.[citation needed]

Effects of acidification on population[edit]

Environmental plasticity[edit]

Increased acidity levels in breeding areas may be problematic for moor frog populations, as it reduces survival and growth of the aquatic embryos and larvae.[30][31][32][33][34] When exposed to acidity, moor frogs were shown to be able to adapt relatively rapidly (within 16–40 generations). Local adaptation to acidity is also possible in survival during the embryonic stage, during which frogs are most sensitive to severe acidity.[35] Moreover, compared to those from neutral sites, acid origin populations have higher embryonic and larval acid tolerance (survival and larval period were less negatively affected by low pH), higher larval growth but slower larval development rates, and larger metamorphosing size. Divergence in embryonic acid tolerance and metamorphic size correlates most strongly with breeding pond pH, whereas divergence in larval period and larval growth correlates most strongly with latitude and predator density, respectively.[36]

Moor frogs can adapt to the various effects of acidification through long-term selection causing genetic change or spontaneous behavioral changes mediated by hormonal responses.[37] Immediate stressors that demand immediate solutions such as sudden shift in temperature or appearance of a predator demand that an individual can respond appropriately such as moving to a more temperate location or evading/fighting off a predator.[38] The extent to which an individual can adapt to respond to a new situation is referred to as an individual’s phenotypic plasticity. These plastic adaptations can be quantitatively analyzed through the measurement of hormones that spike when individuals are under stress i.e. cortisol.[37] Moor frog tadpoles use and understand a variety of chemicals that signal stressors, and acidification can chemically disrupt a tadpole’s ability to receive and send signals, thus making an individual tadpole unable to respond to change some of which may be lethal. Acid-tolerant Moor frogs are larger and more active than Moor frogs that have not acclimatized to acidification.[37] Acid-tolerant Moor frogs also exhibit stronger hormonal responses to immediate dangers i.e. presence of a predator which in turn create stronger behavioral response to evade those predators.[37]

Some acid-tolerant Moor frogs have lower levels of sodium which may be an adaptation to acidification.[39]

Maternal effects[edit]

For female moor frogs, in order to optimize their maternal investments, they need to balance between their own fitness and the fitness of their offspring.[40][41] Additionally, under the great pressure exerted by acidification, female moor frogs also need to do a trade-off between quality and quantity of the offspring.[42]

Environmental stress, like acidity, may either select for or select against certain phenotypes and hence may increase variation in fitness. The adaptive optima for the population would shift greatly compared to those living in less acidic and more benign environments, thereby making the allocation of resources even more important. As a result of the increasing variation in fitness, frogs from acidic environments may also favor different reproductive strategies than those more benign environments.[43] Compared to neutral origin females, acid origin females tend to invest relatively more in fecundity than in egg size, invest more in their offspring than in self-maintenance, and increase their reproductive effort as their residual reproductive value decreases.[42] Consequently, acid origin females increase the clutch size and total reproductive output with age, while neutral origin females only increase egg size but not clutch size or total reproductive output with age.[42]

In conclusion, environmental acidification lowers maternal investment, selects for investment in larger eggs at a cost to fecundity, imposes negative effects on reproductive output, and alters the relationship between female phenotype and maternal investment, as well as strengthens the egg-size-fecundity trade-off.[42]

High habitat acidity often imposes great costs to survival which may lead to the culling of Moor frogs. High acidity imposes stress on eggs; when a habitat is acidic enough embryos often exhibit a developmental defect and become inviable.[44] Egg coats are maternally derived structures that surround Moor frog eggs to protect them.[44] Egg coats can buffer the low pH of the Moor frog’s acidic habitats;[39] however, drastic decreases in habitat pH caused by human-made pollution affects an egg coat’s function.[44] High habitat acidity causes thinning and a loss in the egg coat’s ability to attract water.[44] Thinned egg coats are more tacky and opaque.[44] They make eggs more susceptible to drying out, pathogens, UV light, and prevent gas exchange.[44] The disabling of the egg coat leaves an embryo defenseless and tremendously susceptible to developmental defects. Moor frogs that are more easily killed by acidic waters are unfit and see that their genes are lost from the gene pool. Acidification is strong enough to cause rapid adaptation due to the high selection pressure it places on the Moor frog.[44] As a result, certain highly acidic habitats have seen the development of Moor frogs that are less sensitive to the stress of highly acidic waters.[44] Eggs of acid-tolerant frogs have egg coats with greater negative charge.[44] This suggests glycans give the egg coat its hydrophilic properties.[44] Acid-tolerant eggs also have egg coats that are more acidic which suggest a greater concentration of negatively charged glycans as compared to typical Moor frogs.[44] High acidity is able to reduce an egg coat’s attraction to water because high proton concentration in acidic water is able to protonate, thus neutralize a glycan’s charge.[44] This is also why high habitat pH i.e. low concentration of protons in a pool causes egg coat glycans to deprotonate i.e. give up their protons which restores the egg coat’s negative charge/attraction to water.[44]

Physiology[edit]

Cold Tolerance[edit]

Moor frogs are renowned for their ability to tolerate freezing temperatures especially as a frog where most frog species live in hot and humid tropical environments. Where frogs do live in cold climates many species will attempt to overwinter in bodies of water where ambient temperatures are moderated by water. In these cases, temperatures only reach a few degrees below freezing.[45] The Moor frog is only known to overwinter on land. They overwinter in pits of leaf litter and between tree stumps. Moor frogs from European Russia and Western Siberia are able to tolerate freezing to temperatures as low as -16℃.[45] Moor frogs from Denmark are only able to survive freezing temperatures as low as -4℃ for 3 to 4 days.[45] The minimum freezing temperatures at which frogs are able to survive with 0% mortality is different between different frog populations.[45] Minimum freezing temperatures with some chance of survival appears to decrease from Western Europe to Western Siberia. However, in the aforementioned Siberian and Danish populations mitochondrial DNA testing revealed that they were closely related.[45]

The supercooling point (SCP) is the lowest temperature at which an organism can be cooled to (below freezing) before ice crystals form (cold-tolerant animals often use cryoprotectants that decrease the freezing temperature to prevent the formation of ice).[45] Freeze-tolerant frogs may see up to 65% of their body freeze solid during winter.[46] The Moor frog like many frogs are particularly susceptible to freezing solid because of their skin which is thin and porous—permeable to the exchange of gases and liquids.[46] Formation of ice crystals externally can act as nucleation sites for the formation of crystals inside the Moor frog. When temperatures reach below the SCP a Moor frog’s skin darkens, muscles become rigid, eyes dull, and solid ice can be readily felt through touch.[45] At temperatures between 0℃ and 1℃ frogs assume normal behavior but still respond external stimuli i.e. frogs will leap away if disturbed.[45] At temperatures immediately below freezing frogs assume an overwintering posture with their limbs adducted.[45] When touched at below freezing temperatures, frogs are only capable of slight movements of the limbs and body.[45] Siberian populations exhibit 0% mortality at -8℃, 25% mortality at -10℃, and 50% mortality at -12℃.[45] A few members from a population from Karasuk were able to survive -16℃ albeit with mortality at >90%.[45] The time a frog spends frozen does not seem to affect mortality rather the absolute minimum temperature they experience has the greatest effect on mortality.[45] Frogs have been recorded to spend around 3 months in this frozen state with potential to survive thawing.[45]

Cryoprotectants[edit]

Freezing temperatures imposes tremendous stress on the Moor frog; breathing stops, circulation stops, ice forms in the tissues, and cells are severely dehydrated.[47] To tolerate these tremendous stressors the Moor frog and many other ice-tolerant animals greatly subdue metabolic processes, produce antioxidants, and use other biochemical means to make freezing tolerable i.e. cryoprotectants (anti-freeze).[47] Moor frogs are known to utilize glucose as a cryoprotectant which is formed through gluconeogenesis—a natural process in livers.[47] Because gluconeogenesis is generally restricted to the liver and glycolysis (the breakdown of glucose) continues through wintering, it is presumed there are cryoprotectants other than glucose at play in other parts of the body i.e. the muscles.[47] Glycerol is found a much greater concentrations in the liver and muscles of frozen Moor frogs. Mannose, maltose, and maltitol are also known to be in higher concentrations in the liver and muscles of frozen Moor frogs; however, the change in concentration is not as drastic as the change in concentration of glycerol.[47] Freezing temperatures directly increase the rate at which glucose is broken down.[47] The manufacture of these products all requires the use of glucose, which is stored in a polymeric form, glycogen, in the muscles. As expected, the production of these cryoprotectants and continued metabolism (even though it is slowed) consumes a great quantity of glycogen that is not replenished as the frog is not feeding during the winter.[47]

Lactate and Ethanol are found in higher concentrations in frozen Moor frogs. The Moor frog is the only known terrestrial vertebrate to produce ethanol as a product of glycolysis.[47] These two molecules are products of anerobic processes which is to be expected because breathing/aerobic processes drastically slow down to the point of stopping when the Moor frog is in a frozen state. Products of the breakdown of DNA are found in higher concentrations in frozen Moor frogs suggesting that freezing is a highly stressful process for the frog.[47] Frozen Moor frogs also have greater concentrations of antioxidants; which are presumably made in anticipation of the oxidative stress when aerobic respiration resumes after thawing.[47]

Metabolism during freezing[edit]

Moor frogs still exhibit aerobic respiration at temperatures immediately below 0℃ i.e -0.5℃ to -1℃. However, the amount of oxygen consumed exponentially decreases with each decrease in degree Celsius.[48] The majority of glucose degradation still occurs through anaerobic processes.[48] Glycogen content in muscles reaches 35% in males, 20% in females, and 25% in juveniles by mass in autumn before wintering.[49] Glycogen in the muscles also decrease much more over winter than in the liver as limbs freeze before the core does. Mass of glycogen in the liver decreased by 10 times in females and up to 30 times in males.[49] In a study, female Moor frogs lost 82% in mass of body fat after wintering and males lost 81%.[49]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Kuzmin, S.; Tarkhnishvili, D.; Ishchenko, V.; Tuniyev, B.; Beebee, T.; Anthony, B.P.; Schmidt, B.; Ogrodowczyk, A.; Ogielska, M.; Babik, W.; Vogrin, M.; Loman, J.; Cogalniceanu, D.; Kovács, T.; Kiss, I. (2016) [errata version of 2016 assessment]. "Rana arvalis". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2009: e.T58548A86232114.
  2. ^ SAS, ISTVÁN; COVACIU-MARCOV, SEVERUS-DANIEL; DEMETER, LÁSZLÓ; CICORT-LUCACIU, ALFRED-ŞTEFAN; STRUGARIU, ALEXANDRU (August 2008). "Distribution and status of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) in Romania" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie: 337–354.
  3. ^ Mergeay, Joachim; Neyrinck, Sabrina; Cox, Karen (2020). "Conservation Genetic status of Moor Frog in France" (PDF). Research Institute for Nature and Forest.
  4. ^ Niles Eldredge, ed. (2002). Life on Earth: An Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO.
  5. ^ "Moor Frog (Rana arvalis)". World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2007.
  6. ^ a b c ROČEK, ZBYNĚK; ŠANDERA, MARTIN (August 2008). "Distribution of Rana arvalis in Europe: a historical perspective" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie: 135–150.
  7. ^ Mergeay, Joachim; Neyrinck, Sabrina; Cox, Karen (2020). "Conservation Genetic status of Moor Frog in France" (PDF). Research Institute for Nature and Forest.
  8. ^ Ward, R. D.; Skibinski, D. O.; Woodwark, M. (1992). "Protein heterozygosity, protein structure, and taxonomic differentiation". In K. M. Hecht (ed.). Evolutionary biology. New York: Plenum press. pp. 73–159.
  9. ^ Beebee, T. J. C. (1996). Ecology and conservation of amphibians. London: Chapman and Hall.
  10. ^ Hendry, A. P.; Kinnison, M. T.; Day, T.; Taylor, E. B. (2001). "Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests". Evolution. 55 (3): 459–466. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00780.x. S2CID 23917769.
  11. ^ Raye, Lee (October 2017). "Frogs in pre-industrial Britain". The Herpetological Journal – via British Herpetological Society.
  12. ^ "Frog turns blue for first time in 700 years amid calls for rare amphibians to be reintroduced to Britain". The Telegraph.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  13. ^ "Blue Moor Frog Once Again Seen in the UK After 700 Years in Time for Mating Season".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  14. ^ "'Who doesn't love a turtle?' The teenage boys on a mission – to rewild Britain with reptiles". the Guardian. 2021-01-10. Retrieved 2021-10-27.
  15. ^ a b c d ROČEK, ZBYNĚK; ŠANDERA, MARTIN (August 2008). "Distribution of Rana arvalis in Europe: a historical perspective" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie: 135–150.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i SAS, ISTVÁN; COVACIU-MARCOV, SEVERUS-DANIEL; DEMETER, LÁSZLÓ; CICORT-LUCACIU, ALFRED-ŞTEFAN; STRUGARIU, ALEXANDRU (August 2008). "Distribution and status of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) in Romania" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie: 337–354.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g Mergeay, Joachim; Neyrinck, Sabrina; Cox, Karen (2020). "Conservation Genetic status of Moor Frog in France" (PDF). Research Institute for Nature and Forest.
  18. ^ Burakova, A. V.; Vershinin, V. L.; Vershinina, S. D. (2022-08-01). "Comparative Analysis of the Parasite Fauna of Rana arvalis in the Environmental Gradients of Ural". Inland Water Biology. 15 (4): 464–475. doi:10.1134/S1995082922040289. ISSN 1995-0837.
  19. ^ a b Vershinin, V. L.; Neustroeva, N. S. (2011-10-01). "The role of trematode infestation in the specifics of skeleton morphogenesis of Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842". Doklady Biological Sciences. 440 (1): 290–292. doi:10.1134/S0012496611050073. ISSN 1608-3105.
  20. ^ a b c d e f g h VAN DELFT, JEROEN; CREEMERS, RAYMOND (August 2008). "Distribution, status and conservation of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) in the Netherlands". Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie: 255–268 – via Google Scholar.
  21. ^ a b c d e Stojanova, Anelia; Mollov, Ivelin (2008-11-01). "DIET AND TROPHIC NICHE OVERLAP OF THE MOOR FROG (Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842) AND THE COMMON FROG (Rana temporaria L., 1758) FROM POLAND". Proceedings of the Anniversary Scientific Conference of Ecology: 181–190 – via Google Scholar.
  22. ^ a b c d e Bellemakers, Martijn J. S.; van Dam, Herman (1992-01-01). "Improvement of breeding success of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) by liming of acid moorland pools and the consequences of liming for water chemistry and diatoms". Environmental Pollution. Effects of Acidic Pollutants on Freshwater Plants and Animals. 78 (1): 165–171. doi:10.1016/0269-7491(92)90025-6. ISSN 0269-7491.
  23. ^ LOW, PETER; TOROK, JANOS (July 1998). "Prey size selection and food habits of Water Frogs and Moor Frogs from Kis-Balaton, Hungary" (PDF). Herpetozoa: 71–78 – via Google Scholar.
  24. ^ a b ASZALÓS, Lilla; BOGDAN, Horia; KOVÁCS, Éva-Hajnalka; PETER, Violeta-Ionela (12 March 2005). "Food composition of two Rana species on a forest habitat (Livada Plain, Romania)" (PDF). North-Western Journal of Zoology. 1: 25–30 – via Google Scholar.
  25. ^ a b c d Sherman, Craig; Sagvik, Jorgen; Olsson, Mats (October 26, 2010). "Female Choice for Males with Greater Fertilization Success in the Swedish Moor Frog, Rana arvalis". PLOS ONE. 5 (10): e13634. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013634. PMC 2964304. PMID 21049015.
  26. ^ a b c Hettyey, Attila; Herczeg, Gabor; Laurila, Anssi; Crochet, Pierre-Andre; Merilä, Juha (2009-01-01). "Body temperature, size, nuptial colouration and mating success in male Moor Frogs (Rana arvalis)". Amphibia-Reptilia. 30: 37–43. doi:10.1163/156853809787392784 – via Google Scholar.
  27. ^ a b c d e Ries, C; Spaethe, J; Sztatecsny, M; Strondl, C; Hödl, W (20 October 2008). "Turning blue and ultraviolet: sex-specific colour change during the mating season in the Balkan moor frog". Journal of Zoology. 276 (3): 229–236. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00456.x – via Google Scholar.
  28. ^ Kuzmin, Sergius L. (1999). "Rana arvalis". AmphibiaWeb. Retrieved 26 March 2009.
  29. ^ Otto Berninghausen; Friedo Berninghausen. "Moor frog - Rana arvalis".
  30. ^ Freda, J. (1986). "The influence of acidic pond water on amphibians: a review". Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 30 (1–2): 439–450. Bibcode:1986WASP...30..439F. doi:10.1007/bf00305213. S2CID 189826247.
  31. ^ Freda, J.; Sadinski, W. J.; Dunson, W. A. (1991). "Long term monitoring of amphibian populations with respect to the effects of acidic deposition". Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 55 (3–4): 445–462. Bibcode:1991WASP...55..445F. doi:10.1007/bf00211205. S2CID 85373859.
  32. ^ Pierce, B. A. (1985). "Acid tolerance in amphibians". BioScience. 35 (4): 239–243. doi:10.2307/1310132. JSTOR 1310132.
  33. ^ Pierce, B. A. (1993). "Effects of acid precipitation on amphibians". Ecotoxicology. 2 (1): 65–77. doi:10.1007/bf00058215. PMID 24203120. S2CID 5050232.
  34. ^ Böhmer, J.; Rahmann, H. (1990). "Influence of surface water acidification on amphibians". In W. Hanke (ed.). Biology and physiology of Amphibians. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
  35. ^ Räsänen, K.; Laurila, A.; Merilä, J. (2003). "Geographic variation in acid stress tolerance of the moor frog Rana arvalis. I. Local adaptation". Evolution. 57 (2): 352–362. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0352:gviast]2.0.co;2. S2CID 42580879.
  36. ^ Hangartner, S; Laurila, A; Räsänen, K (2012a). "Adaptive divergence in moor frog (Rana Arvalis) populations along an acidification gradient: inferences from Qst-Fst correlations". Evolution. 66 (3): 867–881. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01472.x. PMID 22380445. S2CID 20964432.
  37. ^ a b c d Scaramella, Nicholas; Mausbach, Jelena; Laurila, Anssi; Stednitz, Sarah; Räsänen, Katja (2022-09-01). "Short-term responses of Rana arvalis tadpoles to pH and predator stress: adaptive divergence in behavioural and physiological plasticity?". Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 192 (5): 669–682. doi:10.1007/s00360-022-01449-2. ISSN 1432-136X. PMC 9388420. PMID 35857071.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  38. ^ Scaramella, Nicholas; Mausbach, Jelena; Laurila, Anssi; Stednitz, Sarah; Räsänen, Katja (2022-09-01). "Short-term responses of Rana arvalis tadpoles to pH and predator stress: adaptive divergence in behavioural and physiological plasticity?". Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 192 (5): 669–682. doi:10.1007/s00360-022-01449-2. ISSN 1432-136X. PMC 9388420. PMID 35857071.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  39. ^ a b Andrén, Claes; Mårdén, Marlene; Nilson, Göran (1989). "Tolerance to Low pH in a Population of Moor Frogs, Rana arvalis, from an Acid and a Neutral Environment: A Possible Case of Rapid Evolutionary Response to Acidification". Oikos. 56 (2): 215–223. doi:10.2307/3565339. ISSN 0030-1299.
  40. ^ Roff, D. A. 1992. "The evolution of life histories. Local adaptation and genetics of acid-stress" Hall, New York, New York, USA.
  41. ^ Sinervo, B (1999). "Mechanistic analysis of natural selection and a refinement of Lack's and Williams's principles". American Naturalist. 154 (S1): S26–S42. doi:10.2307/2463885. JSTOR 2463885. PMID 29586707.
  42. ^ a b c d Räsänen, K.; Söderman, F.; Laurila, A.; Merilä, J. (2008). "Geographic variation in maternal investment: acidity affects egg size and fecundity in Rana arvalis". Ecology. 89 (9): 2553–2562. doi:10.1890/07-0168.1. PMID 18831176.
  43. ^ Kisdi, E., G. Meszna, and L. Pasztor. 19 1998. "Individual optimization: mechanisms shaping the optimal reaction norm". Evolutionary Ecology 12:211-221.
  44. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Shu, Longfei; Suter, Marc J.-F.; Laurila, Anssi; Räsänen, Katja (2015-11-01). "Mechanistic basis of adaptive maternal effects: egg jelly water balance mediates embryonic adaptation to acidity in Rana arvalis". Oecologia. 179 (3): 617–628. doi:10.1007/s00442-015-3332-4. ISSN 1432-1939.
  45. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Berman, D.I.; Bulakhova, N.A.; Meshcheryakova, E.N.; Shekhovtsov, S.V. (09-01-2022). "Overwintering and cold tolerance in the Moor Frog ( Rana arvalis ) across its range". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 98 (11): 705–714. doi:10.1139/cjz-2019-0179. ISSN 0008-4301. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  46. ^ a b Voituron, Yann; Paaschburg, Louise; Holmstrup, Martin; Barré, Hervé; Ramløv, Hans (2009-02-01). "Survival and metabolism of Rana arvalis during freezing". Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 179 (2): 223–230. doi:10.1007/s00360-008-0307-3. ISSN 1432-136X.
  47. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Shekhovtsov, Sergei V.; Bulakhova, Nina A.; Tsentalovich, Yuri P.; Zelentsova, Ekaterina A.; Meshcheryakova, Ekaterina N.; Poluboyarova, Tatiana V.; Berman, Daniil I. (2022-01). "Metabolomic Analysis Reveals That the Moor Frog Rana arvalis Uses Both Glucose and Glycerol as Cryoprotectants". Animals. 12 (10): 1286. doi:10.3390/ani12101286. ISSN 2076-2615. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  48. ^ a b Voituron, Yann; Paaschburg, Louise; Holmstrup, Martin; Barré, Hervé; Ramløv, Hans (2009-02-01). "Survival and metabolism of Rana arvalis during freezing". Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 179 (2): 223–230. doi:10.1007/s00360-008-0307-3. ISSN 1432-136X.
  49. ^ a b c Bulakhova, N.; Shishikina, K. (2022-12-31). "Pre-hibernation energy reserves and their consumption during freezing in the moor frog Rana arvalis in Siberia". The European Zoological Journal. 89 (1): 556–567. doi:10.1080/24750263.2022.2060357.
  • Some parts of this article were translated from the article Grenouille des champs on the French language Wikipedia.

External links[edit]


moor frog Category:Arctic land animals Category:Amphibians of Russia Category:Amphibians of Europe Category:Amphibians of Asia Category:Amphibians described in 1842 Category:Taxa named by Sven Nilsson

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Elwhoelwu/sandbox&oldid=1123514744"