User:Earlypsychosis/neo
originally thought I would write a post-kraepelin - but maybe a Kraepelinian dichotomy is better
Post-Kraepelin is a term used to describe those contemporary perspectives of mental health conditions that challenge the traditional views of mental disorders, as a biological illness with a chronic and deteriorating course. These post Kraepelin views are in contrast to the ideas first proposed by Emil Kraepelin in the early twenty century.
Conceptualisation of a mental health conditions as a falling into continuim and with multiple contributing factors Biopsychosocial model, without assuming a undelying biological illness . Recovery and non diagnostic (formulation) approaches that challenge the empirical basis of diagnosis Bentall RP, Jackson HF, Pilgrim D (November 1988). "Abandoning the concept of 'schizophrenia': some implications of validity arguments for psychological research into psychotic phenomena". Br J Clin Psychol. 27 ( Pt 4) (4): 303–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00795.x. PMID 3063319.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)to schizophrenia are beginning to utlise the term.
Bentall RP, Jackson HF, Pilgrim D (November 1988). "The concept of schizophrenia is dead: long live the concept of schizophrenia?". Br J Clin Psychol. 27 ( Pt 4) (4): 329–31. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00797.x. PMID 3214686.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Traditional ideas about mental disorders[edit]
Kraepelin original conceptualist of mental disorders as distinct categories (e.g. Dementia praecox and manic depression) with their own underlying biological disease process. These views have had a major influence on psychiatry, and form the basis of the operational diagnostic criteria, such as DSM.
The concept first gained popularity in 1990s as the validity of diagnosis [1]
Bentall, R. (2006). Madness explained: Why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a 'complaint-orientated' approach to understanding mental illness Medical Hypotheses. 66, (2) 220-233.
author=Craddock N, Owen MJ |title=The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy |journal=Br J Psychiatry |volume=186 |issue= |pages=364–6 |year=2005 |month=May |pmid=15863738 |doi=10.1192/bjp.186.5.364 |url=http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15863738}}
Rogler, LH. (1997) Making Sense of Historical Changes in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Five Propositions Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 1., pp. 9-20.
Pilgrim D. "The biopsychosocial model in Anglo-American psychiatry: Past, present and future" Journal of Mental Health, Volume 11, Issue 6 December 2002 , pages 585 - 594 DOI 10.1080/09638230020023930
Bentall, R. P., J. Schaler (2004). Sideshow?: Schizophrenia as construed by Szasz and the neoKraepelinians Under fire: Thomas Szasz replies to his critics. Open Court Publications.
Craddock, N.; Owen, M. J. (2010). "The Kraepelinian dichotomy - going, going... But still not gone". The British Journal of Psychiatry 196: 92-95. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.073429.
Also see[edit]
Classification of mental disorders
References[edit]
- ^ Greene, T (2007). The Kraepelinian dichotomy: the twin pillars crumbling?. History of Psychiatry, Vol. 18, No. 3, 361-379
- ^ Bentall RP, Jackson HF, Pilgrim D (November 1988). "Abandoning the concept of 'schizophrenia': some implications of validity arguments for psychological research into psychotic phenomena". Br J Clin Psychol. 27 ( Pt 4) (4): 303–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00795.x. PMID 3063319.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
[[Category:Psychiatry]]
{{mental-health-stub}}
{{psych-stub}}