User:Benwildeboer/VandalismMistakes
Hi My edit was spot-on, and you know it. Block me or whatever you fucking want, you know im right. Mr X.
It's not so much that you incorrectly reverted an edit of mine on the Jupiter article so much as I selected the wrong edit to revert to. It's pretty obvious if you read my edit summary, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't a complete goof on my part. Thanks for catching my mistake. -- wtfunkymonkey 02:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Interesting gizmo this VandalProof - first time i hear about it. Anyway, i did not removed information from the Motorola RAZR V3. i just created an ordered list of references. I should have written a summary for it, and i'll do it next time. Thanks, and take care.
PS - i wasn't logged in when i editing, as it is now...
I was taking out obvious vandalisim on the Six degrees of separation page. There numerous references to Harry Potter as well as placing the word "masturbation" and "penis" in a sentence randomly, Unless you are stupid enough to believe that "Catcher in the Ryehi!" [sic] was written by J.K. Rowling, it'd do you good to put the changes back. PS, maybe you want to read the revisions before automatically reverting them. Thanks.
What are you doing reverting my England National Football team edit!!!!!! .
Hi,
Regarding:
User talk:70.90.171.37 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Venus Swimwear. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Benwildeboer 01:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you kidding? If you really think the update about the model search is "\nonsense and vandalism", then you are a complete moron. It was short, completely accurate, and to the point.
Go read the Venus site to find out about their model search, they haven't been doing them for at least a few years. They do hire from agencies.
The last winners posted on http://www.venusmodelsearch.com/ are from 2004. The home page explains that they've stopped the model search.
If you want facts, they are there. Obviously your information is out of date, and you are too ignorant to keep it up.