Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.

Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 8, 2021; Decided February 24, 2022
Full case name	Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Docket no.	20-915
Citations	595 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
	Lack of either factual or legal knowledge can excuse an inaccuracy in a copyright registration.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer; Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor; Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch; Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
Majority	Breyer, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett
Dissent	Thomas, joined by Alito; Gorsuch (all but Part II)

Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., 595 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a lack of either factual or legal knowledge can excuse an inaccuracy in a copyright registration.^[1]

References[edit]

^ Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., No. 20-915, 595 U.S. ___ (2022)

External links[edit]

Text of Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., 595 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Cornell Justia

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[1] Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., No. 20-915, 595 U.S. ___ (2022)

[1]