Template talk:Title case

This template was considered for deletion on 31 August 2021. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Epic fail[edit]

I am leaving this abortive effort here, it shows two ways you cannot make a title case template. The failure of the nested substituitons is clear, more subtle is the failure of the better design (but still awful) earlier version which called Title case1, which called Title case 2. For some reason one of the calls returns an explciit "#032" type code and breaks everything. Just give us the parser functions tehn it's a simple "explode" and "ucfirst". Rich Farmbrough, 09:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

(Oh yes I know that if this worked it would not have dealt with repeated letters.) Rich Farmbrough, 09:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Making template substitutable[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

I was using this template to regularize files names among a set of articles I was adding related content to, and it failed to completely substitute. I don't know enough about the use of safesubst: vs. subst: and how to use or not use <noinclude/> in templates for general consumption. I would appreciate anyone with some knowledge to get a substitution option into the #if: and #invoke: commands in this template so it can be properly substituted in future. Van Isaac_WS^cont 19:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vanisaac:, thanks for using the edit request template. Unfortunately, this template is used for editors with a conflict of interest. I suggest asking your question at the WP:Help Desk where a more knowledgable editor than me is more likely to see this concern. Sorry I could not be more help. I have marked this request as "answered". Z1720 (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:Tc:" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Tc:. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 26#Template:Tc: until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]