Template talk:Infobox UK Supreme Court case

Law Redirect‑class

	Law portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Image[edit]

It's just my opinion, but maybe the Coat of Arms would serve as a better image, seems in line with other court case infoboxes.--Tærkast (Discuss) 15:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the Supreme Court has made some effort to distance itself from the royal coat of arms, their reasoning is covered here [1]. I would have liked to use the badge of the court but we can't for copyright reasons, so I followed the Canadian precedent here Bob House 884 (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah fair enough. I missed that actually. The template looks pretty good anyway.--Tærkast (Discuss) 16:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, its mostly stolen from the US version Bob House 884 (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I won't tell.--Tærkast (Discuss) 17:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that this is duplicating the Template:Infobox court case, I've just updated that template to automatically use the image: File:UK Supreme Court badge.svg --Lindengr (talk)) 16:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to revive this old thread, but doesn't use of the badge (File:Supreme court crest (official).svg) in this case fulfil WP:FUR under fair use? Legendiii (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New sections[edit]

A section on the membership of the court, any interveners, and any interested parties in a case should be added. I am not sure how to or I would act boldly and do it myself. Sport and politics (talk) 11:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]