This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
I removed the character list from this template. All the character pages redirect to the main article now, so I don't see any point in having the character list in this template any longer... Kamek (talk) 01:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
@Grapesoda22: Navigational template's should only include full articles. Redirects, sections and redlinks shouldn't be there. It being "Valid information. No reason to remove." is sems like POV on your part.★Trekker (talk) 14:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Grapesoda22: You know, when I was nice enough to start a conversation and ping someone I was kind of expecting a response.★Trekker (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Look, in most cases redirects and section links should be avoided. But in cretin cases it can be justified. The fact that the title of the show changed repeatedly is a major aspect of the shows history and shouldn't be glossed over in a Navbox devoted to the show. Grapesoda22 (✉) 00:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But a navbox exists to link extant articles not necessarily tell the reader much about them.★Trekker (talk) 00:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Its a major major major thing it really is worth mentioning. Grapesoda22 (✉) 00:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I don't get why but I won't push it anymore. I'm tired of navbox stuff.★Trekker (talk) 00:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
