Template:Did you know nominations/Valerie Aurora

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Valerie Aurora[edit]

Valerie Anita Aurora

  • ... that when Valerie Aurora (pictured) legally changed her name she chose Anita as her middle name, after computer scientist Anita Borg?

Created/expanded by Antony-22 (talk). Nominated by SarahStierch (talk) at 15:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment Ack! I just realized that I nominated this and it was started on March 27 and expanded on March 28. Looks like I'm too late. Sorry to waste peoples time on this one! Sarah (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Sarah. I tried to find a way to count this and still will if we can. But 5x (3450, or really 6x = 4140 because that's how I read the Rules?) the copied text (690) is much more than we have here (1967). Can you expand it more? -SusanLesch (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I actually can't expand on it due to conflict of interest (Valerie is a friend and a colleague), and it was created at an edit-a-thon (I wasn't involved in), and I was shown it and thought it'd be fun to promote. So, I don't really feel comfortable working on it! Sarah (talk) 16:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks anyway and good luck. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Date, hook and source all check out. If the copied text is not counted then this qualifies. If someone else could double check that would be great. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty sure there is a grace period of a couple days when creating an article so this isn't an expansion but a straight creation. So article is over 1500 character as as stated above: "Date, hook and source all check out" -- Esemono (talk) 08:57, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Ready to go! Thank you, Esemono, for your second opinion. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Comment - Great! Working on getting a photo. The few that we have aren't that great, so I'm hoping for a headshot. Will know by the end of today. Sarah (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I was actually just about to nominate this article myself—a little late because I was on vacation in the interim—but I see you have beat me to it! The hook you chose was even the same one I was thinking about. I'd like to suggest the following hook which is functionally equivalent but less wordy. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 04:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

  • ALT1 is fine, thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)