Template:Did you know nominations/Louis des Balbes de Berton de Crillon, duc de Mahon
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:36, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Louis des Balbes de Berton de Crillon, duc de Mahon[edit]
- ... that after being defeated at Gibraltar, the Duke of Crillon (pictured) wrote to his former adversary, General George Eliott, calling him "my dear and respectable enemy"?
5x expanded by Prioryman (talk). Self nominated at 22:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC).
- Notification to reviewers
- Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews. When you have completed a review, please update the respective table below to change the background color to green and note that the review has been completed.
| First review completed |
- No problems with it.
Article new enough, long enough, and adequately cited. Hook short enough, interesting enough, and also cited. Article appears to be neutral and free of copyright violations and plagiarism. Cheers!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
| Second review completed |
Clearly a 5x expansion, so new enough, long enough, hook OK, the article itself could tone down a few overly-flowery adjectives, but no apparent POV-pushing nor other problems, is cited and no evident copyvio problems, Image is OK, looks good to go. Montanabw(talk) 22:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
A specific declaration that there is neither COI nor promotion concerns needs to be made by a reviewer; "nor other problems" is simply too vague under the circumstances. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Upon further review, this is a straightforward biography of an individual and balances both his successes and failures. I see no COI nor any promotional concerns. The article is NPOV and a simple biography. Montanabw(talk) 17:49, 2 July 2013 (UTC)