Template:Did you know nominations/GIVU effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 22:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues

GIVU effect[edit]

logo of GIVU effect
logo of GIVU effect
  • ... that GIVU effect is a youth-focused NGO in Korea aiming to foster a giving and sharing culture?

Created by Bohyunlee (talk) and Limji1234 (talk). Nominated by Bohyunlee (talk) at 05:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC).

  • It appears that you have taken an article without any references and added sources. Good job! However, the text has not been increased 5x within 7 days of your nomination – or, giving an extra day, since December 6. Before that December 6 edit, the character count was 1660, and now it is 2779. (The lists under History don't count in the character count.) I'm afraid this doesn't satisfy the DYK rules. Yoninah (talk) 01:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: the article was created 13 October 2015 then moved to userspace on 19 October 2015‎ (presumably it was accidentally created in mainspace?) It was then worked on in the userspace before being moved back to mainspace on 14 December 2015‎. Jolly Ω Janner 07:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you, @Jolly Janner: for clarifying that. I did spend a lot of time looking at the history, but didn't catch that. So yes, the article is eligible as a start-class article. However, it needs copyediting for English grammar, and a tag has been placed on the page to that effect. The paragraph under Meaning of the Name needs at least one citation, per DYK rules. Pinging @Piotrus: to ask if the foreign-language refs are reliable sources. Yoninah (talk) 10:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: I don't read Korean, but some of the refs are major Korean newspapers. I would really prefer to have a Korean speaker check if those references support the text in the article (students often have problems with that part, sigh), but since nobody is likely to help, I can't but say AGF here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Piotrus, without a copyedit, the article can't be promoted regardless of the sourcing. If no one is going to take care of that and the other templated article issues—and since neither article creator has edited since December 18, it seems unlikely that they'll be doing anything more to the article—then I don't see this nomination can proceed any further. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Per Piotrus, the identified issues with the article don't have anyone to fix them, so this nomination is marked for closure as unsuccessful. Sorry things didn't work out. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)