Template:Did you know nominations/Göran Fredrik Göransson

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Göran Fredrik Göransson

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Portrait of Göransson

• ... that Göran Fredrik Göransson (pictured) was the first to successfully implement the Bessemer process for steel production on an industrial scale? Source: "Göran Fredrik Göransson". Tekniska Museet. 24 January 2012. Retrieved 2 November 2016."Sandvikens Jernverk AB - innovative since 1862" (PDF). nasdaqomx.com. p. 1. Retrieved 3 November 2016.

• ALT1: ... that Göran Fredrik Göransson was the first to successfully implement the Bessemer process for steel production on an industrial scale in 1858?
• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kronkåsa
• Comment: Article was created in my user-space on 2 November and moved to article space on 3 November. (This is my 1st DYK nomination)

Created by Ciridae (talk). Self-nominated at 10:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC).

I formatted a bit, hope that's ok, and will probably look into it, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations to you first DYK nom!. Nice article, more substantial than the Swedish one! In case you translated anything from the Swedish (which I can't tell) you should make a note on the talk page. Many and good sources, mostly in Swedish which I accept AGF (short for "assuming good faith). In the legacy section, you mention the son who would succeed his father ..., and then say "he" meaning the father. I think the best way to avoid that is to mention the succession after the death. Sometimes a load of references for one fact seems too much of a good thing, - consider to have no more than two. No reference is needed in the lead (summary) as long as the facts there are sourced in the article. - The hook is fine, and I like better without the year which doesn't make it more interesting ;) - Approved! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)